Mobility justice and accessible public transport networks for people with intellectual disability

被引:22
作者
van Holstein, Ellen [1 ]
Wiesel, Ilan [1 ]
Legacy, Crystal [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Geog, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Melbourne Sch Design, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Inclusive public transport; mobility justice; intellectual disability; inclusive decision-making; performative research; INCLUSION; IMPAIRMENTS; MELBOURNE; POLITICS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/23800127.2020.1827557
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper aims to advance the debate on transport accessibility. While cognitive barriers to accessibility receive some attention in public transport research and policy, studies focus on discrete services and little research has addressed access solutions focused on the scale of the transport network. To address this gap, this paper presents the results from a one-day focus group with 16 public transport and disability advocacy practitioners in Victoria, Australia. The study reveals three concurrent ongoing developments in Victorian public transport that pose both opportunities and barriers to improving accessibility for people with intellectual disabilities across the extended metropolitan network. They are: diversification of transport services and providers; increased reliance on innovation in communication technology; and the need for inclusive forms of citizen participation mechanisms. The paper builds on the theory of mobility justice to argue that achieving greater transport accessibility requires network-wide, collaborative policies on accessibility. The paper demonstrates that a focus on cognitive access barriers in public transport enriches mobility justice as it highlights the distributed responsibility across a public transport network for the limited mobility of a marginalised group.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 162
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
AIHW, 2008, DISABILITY AUSTR INT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport
[3]  
Anstey KJ, 2016, POPULATION AGEING AND AUSTRALIA'S FUTURE, P165
[4]   The Need for Greater Transparency When Assessing the Performance and Prospects of Melbourne's Rail Franchise Contracts [J].
Ashmore, David Patrick ;
Stone, John ;
Kirk, Yvonne .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (01) :82-96
[5]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2012, 4433.0.55.003- Intellectual Disability, Australia, 2012
[6]   The impacts of limited transportation access on persons with disabilities' social participation [J].
Bascom, Graydon W. ;
Christensen, Keith M. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2017, 7 :227-234
[7]   Communication access on trains: a qualitative exploration of the perspectives of passengers with communication disabilities [J].
Bigby, Christine ;
Johnson, Hilary ;
O'Halloran, Robyn ;
Douglas, Jacinta ;
West, Denise ;
Bould, Emma .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 41 (02) :125-132
[8]  
Cameron J., 2016, Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, V4th
[9]   Bodily learning for a (climate) changing world: registering differences through performative and collective research [J].
Cameron, Jenny ;
Manhood, Craig ;
Pomfrett, Jamie .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 16 (06) :493-508
[10]   Towards a politics of mobility [J].
Cresswell, Tim .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 2010, 28 (01) :17-31