Towards explaining the health impacts of residential energy efficiency interventions - A realist review. Part 1: Pathways

被引:61
作者
Willand, Nicola [1 ]
Ridley, Ian [1 ]
Maller, Cecily [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT Univ, Coll Design & Social Context, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Ctr Urban Res, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
Energy efficiency; Housing; Health; Wellbeing; Heating; Evidence; Realist review; IMPROVING HOUSING CONDITIONS; LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS; INDOOR TEMPERATURES; GREEN RENOVATION; THERMAL COMFORT; FUEL POVERTY; STAYING WELL; KEEPING WARM; HOME; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper is Part 1 of a realist review that tries to explain the impacts of residential energy efficiency interventions (REEIs) on householder health. According to recent systematic reviews residential energy efficiency interventions may benefit health. It is argued that home energy improvement are complex interventions and that a better understanding of the latent mechanisms and contextual issues that may shape the outcome of interventions is needed for effective intervention design. This realist review synthesises the results of 28 energy efficiency improvement programmes. This first part provides a review of the explanatory factors of the three key pathways, namely warmth in the home, affordability of fuel and psycho-social factors, and the pitfall of inadequate indoor air quality. The review revealed that REEIs improved winter warmth and lowered relative humidity with benefits for cardiovascular and respiratory health. In addition, residential energy efficiency improvements consolidated the meaning of the home as a safe haven, strengthened the householder's perceived autonomy and enhanced social status. Although satisfaction with the home proved to be an important explanation for positive mental health outcomes, financial considerations seemed to have played a secondary role. Evidence for negative impacts was rare but the risk should not be dismissed. Comprehensive refurbishments were not necessarily more effective than thermal retrofits or upgrades. A common protocol for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of interventions would facilitate the synthesis of future studies. Householder and contextual influences are addressed in Part 2. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 201
页数:11
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, The health impacts of cold homes and fuel poverty
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, COST BENEFIT EVALUAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], INVESTIGATION POTENT
  • [4] The Watcombe Housing Study: the short term effect of improving housing conditions on the health of residents
    Barton, Andy
    Basham, Meryl
    Foy, Chris
    Buckingham, Ken
    Somerville, Margaret
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2007, 61 (09) : 771 - 777
  • [5] Basham M., 2003, UN HLTH HOUS PROM GO
  • [6] Basham Meryl., 2004, Central Heating: Uncovering the Impact on Social Relationships and Household Management
  • [7] Will drivers for home energy efficiency harm occupant health?
    Bone, Angie
    Murray, Virginia
    Myers, Isabella
    Dengel, Andy
    Crump, Derrick
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 130 (05) : 233 - 238
  • [8] Braubach M., 2008, Preliminary results of the WHO Frankfurt housing intervention project
  • [9] Energy efficiency, housing, equity and health
    Braubach, Matthias
    Ferrand, Arnaud
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 58 (03) : 331 - 332
  • [10] Health Outcomes and Green Renovation of Affordable Housing
    Breysse, Jill
    Jacobs, David E.
    Weber, William
    Dixon, Sherry
    Kawecki, Carol
    Aceti, Susan
    Lopez, Jorge
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2011, 126 : 64 - 75