Middle-Class, Cosmopolitans and Precariat among Millennials between Automobility and Multimodality

被引:20
作者
Groth, Soeren [1 ,2 ]
Hunecke, Marcel [2 ]
Wittowsky, Dirk [3 ]
机构
[1] ILS Res Inst Reg & Urban Dev gGmbH, Res Grp Mobil & Space, Dortmund, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Dortmund, Fac Appl Social Studies, Dortmund, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Mobil & Urban Planning, Duisburg, Germany
关键词
Automobility; Multimodality; Mobilities; Social milieus; Class; Psychology of mobility; Material mode options; Mobility resources; TRAVEL MODE CHOICE; YOUNG-ADULTS; LIFE-STYLES; TRANSPORT POVERTY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; MOBILITY STYLES; CAR USE; CLASS DISAFFILIATION; ATTITUDES; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trip.2021.100467
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper refers to the concept of social milieus - which classifies societies according to socio-economic and socio-cultural criteria - and applies it to the everyday mobilities of young Millennials. Starting from three contrasting young social milieus from different social classes - cosmopolitans, middle-class and precariat - differences in material mode options and psychological evaluations of transport modes were investigated, which can be understood as (individual and collective) preconditions for participation in certain hegemonic or alternative transport regimes. For this purpose, quantitative data from Germany from the early 2010s of 852 young people aged 17 to 24 were used. As a result, this study contrasts the often-proclaimed linear regime shift towards multimodality, which would treat Millennials as a supposed collective driving force. The data reveal milieuspecific deviations from the predominant transition narrative as follows: First, young cosmopolitans seem to be the only group to share the historically momentous radical emotional distance from private automobility, which is reflected in 'green' multimodal behaviours. In contrast, the young middle-class shows signs of (conservatively) reproducing car-oriented behaviours. Finally, the young precariat faces socio-economic restrictions and tends to be outside the dualistic categorisation of automobility/multimodality. In conclusion, we see the concept of social milieus as an important thought-provoking impetus for a necessary change of perspective in international transport and mobility research to make the problem of social division in transportation more visible. If the direction towards multimodality aligns with the normative compass for a socioecological transformation, (transport) policies must provide even stronger support to milieu-specific framework conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 154 条
[51]   Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis [J].
Gardner, Benjamin ;
Abraham, Charles .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 11 (04) :300-311
[52]  
Gatersleben Birgitta., 2007, Threats from Car Traffic to the Quality of Urban Life: Problems, Causes, and Solutions, P219, DOI 10.1108/9780080481449-012
[53]   A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies [J].
Geels, Frank W. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 24 :471-482
[54]   The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860-1930) [J].
Geels, FW .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2005, 17 (04) :445-476
[55]  
Geiselberger Heinrich., 2017, The Great Regression
[56]  
Giddens A., 1984, The Constitution of Society
[57]  
Giddens A., 1990, CONSEQUENCES MODERNI
[58]  
Gotz K., 2004, Bleibt das Auto mobil? Mobilitat und Automobil im interdisziplinaren Diskurs, P224
[59]  
Grabka M., 2008, The Shrinking German Middle Class: Signs of Long-Term Polarization in Disposable Income?
[60]   Citizens of the (green) world? Cosmopolitan orientation and sustainability [J].
Grinstein, Amir ;
Riefler, Petra .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2015, 46 (06) :694-714