From Geometry to Conceptual Relativity

被引:10
作者
Barrett, Thomas William [1 ]
Halvorson, Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DEFINITIONAL EQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10670-016-9858-y
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The purported fact that geometric theories formulated in terms of points and geometric theories formulated in terms of lines are "equally correct" is often invoked in arguments for conceptual relativity, in particular by Putnam and Goodman. We discuss a few notions of equivalence between first-order theories, and we then demonstrate a precise sense in which this purported fact is true. We argue, however, that this fact does not undermine metaphysical realism.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1063
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Andréka H, 2005, MATH LOGIC QUART, V51, P591, DOI 10.1002/malq.200410051/www.mlq-journal.org
[2]  
Andreka H., 2014, J VANBENTHEM LOGIC I
[3]  
Andreka H., 2008, DEFINING NEW UNIVERS, V93
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1930, GRUNDLAGEN GEOMETRIE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Word and Object
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Fundamenta Mathematicae
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1959, PHILOS MATH
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Metamathematische Methoden in der Geometrie
[9]  
Barnes D.W., 1975, ALGEBRAIC INTRO MATH
[10]  
Barrett T. W., 2015, QUINES CONJECT UNPUB