Distribution of Absorbed Dose in Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study With Radiochromic Films

被引:8
|
作者
Russo, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Coppola, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Mettivier, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dipartimento Sci Fis, Lab Med Phys, I-80126 Naples, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Napoli, I-80126 Naples, Italy
关键词
Computed tomography imaging; dosimetry; CT; DOSIMETRY; GEOMETRY; MAMMOTOMOGRAPHY; COEFFICIENTS; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1109/TNS.2010.2050005
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography (CBBCT) of the pendant breast with dedicated scanners is an experimental 3D X-ray imaging technique for breast cancer diagnosis under evaluation in comparison to conventional two-view 2-D mammography of the compressed breast. In CBBCT it is generally assumed that a more uniform distribution of the radiation dose to the breast volume can be obtained, with respect to mammography, at equal Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) levels. In fact, in CBBCT the X-ray beam rotates for 360 deg around the breast, while in each mammography view the breast is irradiated from one side only. Using a CBBCT laboratory scanner developed by our group, we have measured the distribution of the radiation dose in a hemi-ellipsoidal PMMA breast phantom of 14 cm diameter simulating the average uncompressed breast, using radiochromic films type XR-SP inserted at mid-plane in the phantom. The technique factors were 80 kVp (5.6 mm Al Half Value Layer), tube load in the range 23-100 mAs, for an air kerma at isocenter in the range 4.7-20 mGy, for a calculated MGD in the range 3.5-15 mGy for a 14 cm diameter breast of 50% glandularity. Results indicate that the dose decreases from the periphery to the center of the phantom, and that along a transverse profile, the relative dose variation Delta = ((edge-center)/center) is up to (25 +/- 4) % at a distance of 80 mm from the nipple. As for the relative dose variation along the phantom longitudinal axis, the maximum value at middle of the phantom measured is delta = ((nipple-chest wall)/chest wall) = -(15 +/- 4) %, indicating that the dose decreases from the chest wall toward the nipple. The values of the parameters Delta and delta depend also on the height of the X-ray tube focal spot with respect to the phantom vertex (nipple). Results are in rough agreement with similar previous determinations using thermoluminescence dosimeters.
引用
收藏
页码:2220 / 2229
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INFLUENCE OF LEAD APRON SHIELDING ON ABSORBED DOSES FROM CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    Rottke, Dennis
    Andersson, Jonas
    Ejima, Ken-Ichiro
    Sawada, Kunihiko
    Schulze, Dirk
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 175 (01) : 110 - 117
  • [32] Absorbed dose model to scan parameters in dental cone beam computed tomography
    Jia, Shumei
    Guo, Xiaoyue
    Xing, Yuxiang
    Zhang, Li
    2019 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2019,
  • [33] Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography: Time for a New Paradigm in Breast Imaging
    O'Connell, Avice M.
    Marini, Thomas J.
    Kawakyu-O'Connor, Daniel T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [34] Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography
    Olszewski, R.
    Frison, L.
    Wisniewski, M.
    Denis, J. M.
    Vynckier, S.
    Cosnard, G.
    Zech, F.
    Reychler, H.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (01) : 285 - 292
  • [35] Optimising the parameters of cochlear implant imaging with cone-beam computed tomography
    Soederqvist, Samuel
    Sivonen, Ville
    Aarnisalo, Antti
    Karppi, Harri
    Sinkkonen, Saku T.
    Koivisto, Juha
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2023, 199 (05) : 462 - 470
  • [36] Cone-beam computed tomography of mandibular foramen and lingula for mandibular anesthesia
    Ahn, Byeong-Seob
    Oh, Song Hee
    Heo, Chong-Kwan
    Kim, Gyu-Tae
    Choi, Yong-Suk
    Hwang, Eui-Hwan
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2020, 50 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [37] Scatter Correction in Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography: Simulations and Experiments
    Mettivier, G.
    Lanconelli, N.
    Lo Meo, S.
    Russo, P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2012, 59 (05) : 2008 - 2019
  • [38] Is Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?
    Deeb, George
    Antonos, Ludmils
    Tack, Samuel
    Carrico, Caroline
    Laskin, Daniel
    Deeb, Janina Golob
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (02) : 285 - 289
  • [39] Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans
    Lamichane, Manish
    Anderson, Nina Kay
    Rigali, Paul H.
    Seldin, Edward B.
    Will, Leslie A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (02) : 156.e1 - 156.e6
  • [40] Measurement of the MTF of a Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography Laboratory Scanner
    Mettivier, Giovanni
    Russo, Paolo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2011, 58 (03) : 703 - 713