Risk-based centralized data monitoring of clinical trials at the time of COVID-19 pandemic

被引:10
作者
Afroz, Most Alina [1 ]
Schwarber, Grant [2 ]
Bhuiyan, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel [2 ]
机构
[1] Begum Rokeya Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Rangpur, Bangladesh
[2] Medpace Inc, Dept Biostat, 5375 Medpace Way, Cincinnati, OH 45227 USA
关键词
Centralize data monitoring; Risk based data monitoring; DATA QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2021.106368
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: COVID-19 pandemic caused several alarming challenges for clinical trials. On-site source data verification (SDV) in the multicenter clinical trial became difficult due to travel ban and social distancing. For multicenter clinical trials, centralized data monitoring is an efficient and cost-effective method of data monitoring. Centralized data monitoring reduces the risk of COVID-19 infections and provides additional capabilities compared to on-site monitoring. The key steps for on-site monitoring include identifying key risk factors and thresholds for the risk factors, developing a monitoring plan, following up the risk factors, and providing a management plan to mitigate the risk. Methods: For analysis purposes, we simulated data similar to our clinical trial data. We classified the data monitoring process into two groups, such as the Supervised analysis process, to follow each patient remotely by creating a dashboard and an Unsupervised analysis process to identify data discrepancy, data error, or data fraud. We conducted several risk-based statistical analysis techniques to avoid on-site source data verification to reduce time and cost, followed up with each patient remotely to maintain social distancing, and created a centralized data monitoring dashboard to ensure patient safety and maintain the data quality. Conclusion: Data monitoring in clinical trials is a mandatory process. A risk-based centralized data review process is cost-effective and helpful to ignore on-site data monitoring at the time of the pandemic. We summarized how different statistical methods could be implemented and explained in SAS to identify various data error or fabrication issues in multicenter clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Risk-based Monitoring of Clinical Trials: An Integrative Approach
    Agrafiotis, Dimitris K.
    Lobanov, Victor S.
    Farnum, Michael A.
    Yang, Eric
    Ciervo, Joseph
    Walega, Michael
    Baumgart, Adam
    Mackey, Aaron J.
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 40 (07) : 1204 - 1212
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, ICH harmonised guideline: integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, FRAUD MISCONDUCT MED
  • [4] Ensuring trial validity by data quality assurance and diversification of monitoring methods
    Baigent, Colin
    Harrell, Frank E.
    Buyse, Marc
    Emberson, Jonathan R.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 5 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [5] The potential for central monitoring techniques to replace on-site monitoring: findings from an international multi-centre clinical trial
    Bakobaki, Julie M.
    Rauchenberger, Mary
    Joffe, Nicola
    McCormack, Sheena
    Stenning, Sally
    Meredith, Sarah
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2012, 9 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [6] Beauregard A., 2018, APPL CLIN TRIALS, V27
  • [7] Buyse M, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P3435, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991230)18:24<3435::AID-SIM365>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-O
  • [9] Collins J.C., 2017, J ACCOUNTANCY, V223, P44
  • [10] The Mahalanobis distance
    De Maesschalck, R
    Jouan-Rimbaud, D
    Massart, DL
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2000, 50 (01) : 1 - 18