Assessing spatial predictive models in the environmental sciences: Accuracy measures, data variation and variance explained

被引:49
|
作者
Li, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Geosci Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Predictive accuracy; Error measure; Data variance; Model assessment; Spatial interpolation methods; Spatial predictions; ABSOLUTE ERROR MAE; INTERPOLATION METHODS; PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION; VARIABLES; RMSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A comprehensive assessment of the performance of predictive models is necessary as they have been increasingly employed to generate spatial predictions for environmental management and conservation and their accuracy is crucial to evidence-informed decision making and, policy. In this study, we clarified relevant issues associated with variance explained (VEcv) by predictive models, established the relationships between VEcv and commonly used accuracy measures and unified these measures under VEcv that is independent of unit/scale and data variation. We quantified the relationships between these measures and data variation and found about 65% compared models and over 45% recommended models for generating spatial predictions explained no more than 50% data variance. We classified the predictive models based on VEcv, which provides a tool to directly compare the accuracy of predictive models for data with different unit/scale and variation and establishes a cross-disciplinary context and benchmark for assessing predictive models in future studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accounting for the spatial variation of phosphorus available explained by environmental covariates
    Nalin, Renan Storno
    Dalmolin, Ricardo Simao Diniz
    Pedron, Fabricio de Araujo
    Moura-Bueno, Jean Michel
    Horst, Taciara Zborowski
    Schenato, Ricardo Bergamo
    Soligo, Matheus Flesch
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2023, 32
  • [22] Conditional repeatability and the variance explained by reaction norm variation in random slope models
    Schielzeth, Holger
    Nakagawa, Shinichi
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 13 (06): : 1214 - 1223
  • [23] Better null models for assessing predictive accuracy of disease models
    Keyel, Alexander C. C.
    Kilpatrick, A. Marm
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (05):
  • [24] A comparison of different measures of the proportion of explained variance in multiply imputed data sets
    van Ginkel, Joost R.
    Karch, Julian D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 77 (03): : 672 - 693
  • [25] Heat hardening in a tropical lizard: geographic variation explained by the predictability and variance in environmental temperatures
    Phillips, Ben L.
    Munoz, Martha M.
    Hatcher, Amberlee
    Macdonald, Stewart L.
    Llewelyn, John
    Lucy, Vanessa
    Moritz, Craig
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 30 (07) : 1161 - 1168
  • [26] Clustering and invariant measures for spatial branching models with infinite variance
    Klenke, A
    ANNALS OF PROBABILITY, 1998, 26 (03): : 1057 - 1087
  • [27] Measures of explained variation under the mixture cure model for survival data
    Peng, Yingwei
    Wang, Yuyao
    Xu, Ronghui
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (03) : 228 - 245
  • [28] Quantifying Explained Variance in Multilevel Models: An Integrative Framework for Defining R-Squared Measures
    Rights, Jason D.
    Sterba, Sonya K.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2019, 24 (03) : 309 - 338
  • [29] On measures of explained variance in nonrecursive structural equation models (vol 85, pg 125, 2000)
    Bentler, PM
    Raykov, T
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (03) : 330 - 330
  • [30] Assessing the accuracy of predictive models for numerical data: Not r nor r2, why not? Then what?
    Li, Jin
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):