Interpersonal influences on patients' surgical decision making: the role of close others

被引:30
作者
Rini, Christine [1 ,2 ]
Jandorf, Lina [2 ]
Goldsmith, Rachel E. [3 ]
Manne, Sharon L. [4 ]
Harpaz, Noam [2 ]
Itzkowitz, Steven H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] UMDNJ Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
Decision making; Interpersonal; Partner; Social control; Social influence; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOCIAL-CONTROL; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BEHAVIORS; PROSTATE-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; VALIDATION; DYSPLASIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10865-011-9323-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Patients make medical decisions in consultation with their partner, family, and friends. However, little is known about the ways in which these close others influence their decisions, particularly with respect to discrete decisions such as those related to medical treatments. This cross-sectional study investigated their influence on the surgical decisions of inflammatory bowel disease patients referred for surgery to remove their colon (N = 91). Guided by research on social control and classic research on power and influence in close relationships, we identified four types of close other decision influence: persuasion, assistance with understanding, indirect influence, and negative influence. Linear logistic and regression analyses showed that patients were more likely to have surgery when their close other used persuasion, and they reported lower decisional conflict when their close other helped them understand the decision. Patients were less likely to have surgery and reported greater decisional conflict when their close other used negative influence tactics. Findings demonstrate the importance of considering social context when investigating patient decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 407
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, PSYCHOL REACTANCE
[2]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[3]  
Beach S.R., 1996, HDB SOCIAL SUPPORT F, P43, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4899-1388-3_3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-1388-3_3]
[4]  
BERNSTEIN CN, 1994, LANCET, V343, P71
[5]   Health-related social influence: A social ecological perspective on tactic use [J].
Butterfield, RM ;
Lewis, MA .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2002, 19 (04) :505-526
[6]   Concerns of patients with inflammatory bowel disease - A review of emerging themes [J].
Casati, J ;
Toner, BB ;
de Rooy, EC ;
Drossman, DA ;
Maunder, RG .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2000, 45 (01) :26-31
[7]   Is 'watchful waiting' a real choice for men with prostate cancer? A qualitative study [J].
Chapple, A ;
Ziebland, S ;
Herxheimer, A ;
Mcpherson, A ;
Shepperd, S ;
Miller, R .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (03) :257-264
[8]   The effect of restorative proctocolectomy on sexual function, urinary function, fertility, pregnancy and delivery: A systematic review [J].
Cornish, Julie A. ;
Tan, Emile ;
Teare, Julian ;
Teoh, Teoh G. ;
Rai, Raj ;
Darzi, Ara W. ;
Paraskevas, Paraskeva ;
Clark, Susan K. ;
Tekkis, Paris P. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (08) :1128-1138
[9]   Marital status, marital satisfaction, and support processes among women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Coyne, JC ;
Anderson, KK .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) :629-641
[10]   Factors Associated With Decisions to Undergo Surgery Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Early-Stage Lung Cancer [J].
Cykert, Samuel ;
Dilworth-Anderson, Peggye ;
Monroe, Michael H. ;
Walker, Paul ;
McGuire, Franklin R. ;
Corbie-Smith, Giselle ;
Edwards, Lloyd J. ;
Bunton, Audrina Jones .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (23) :2368-2376