Simple Method to Predict Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:15
作者
Skarecky, Douglas [1 ]
Morales, Blanca [1 ]
Chang, Alexandra [1 ]
Ahlering, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; URINARY CONTINENCE; URETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS; RECONSTRUCTION; PRESERVATION; FEASIBILITY; RESTORATION; OUTCOMES; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2011.0013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: After removal of the Foley catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), recovery of continence can take days to months. We sought to identify a simple means to predict time to recovery of postoperative continence. Patients and Methods: Preoperative characteristics on 172 men who were undergoing RARP were entered into an electronic database. All men were queried via telephone and/or returned a 7-day log of pad use. Men without need for pads were excluded (n = 41). At 4 to 7 days, responses were grouped as: one pad (n = 55), two pads (n = 35), or three or more pads (n = 41). Patients returned self-addressed postcards noting the date of 0-pad urinary status. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables were assessed for ability to predict time to continence. Results: No preoperative factors, such as age, International Index of Erectile Function-5, prostate-specific antigen level, American Urological Association symptom score, body mass index, uroflowmetry, nerve-sparing status, estimated blood loss, or prostate weight, were found to predict time to continence. Pad use at 4 to 7 days, however, was highly correlated with median time to continence. The median time to continence for men using one pad was 35 days, two pads was 42 days, and for three or more pads was 73 days (P = 0.0001). Conclusions: As has been previously reported, we found no reliable baseline factors that predicted postoperative time to 0-pad continence. We did find that determining pad usage at 4 to 7 days after catheter removal strongly predicted time to pad-free continence. This method is simpler then pad weights, predicts high-and low-risk men for delayed continence, and can be used for counseling/intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1455
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Preoperative and Intraoperative Measurements of Urethral Length as Predictors of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Hakimi, A. Ari ;
Faleck, David M. ;
Agalliu, Ilir ;
Rozenblit, Alla M. ;
Chernyak, Victoria ;
Ghavamian, Reza .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (06) :1025-1030
[32]   Urinary Continence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Using the Peritoneal Fixation Technique [J].
Terao, Hideyuki ;
Nagasaka, Hirotaka ;
Yamamoto, Shotaro ;
Suzuki, Atsuto ;
Usui, Kimitsugu ;
Kishida, Takeshi ;
Nakaigawa, Noboru .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2025, 18 (01)
[33]   Impact of modified bladder neck suspension on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) [J].
Moon, Hyong Woo ;
Rhew, Seung Ah ;
Yoon, Chang Eil ;
Kwon, Hyeok Jae ;
Park, Yong Hyun ;
Lee, Ji Youl .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (05) :2279-2285
[34]   Robot-Assisted radical Prostatectomy [J].
Wagner, Christian ;
Addali, Mustapha ;
Witt, Joern H. .
AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) :483-497
[35]   A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Dalela, Deepansh ;
Jeong, Wooju ;
Prasad, Madhu-Ashni ;
Sood, Akshay ;
Abdollah, Firas ;
Diaz, Mireya ;
Karabon, Patrick ;
Sammon, Jesse ;
Jamil, Marcus ;
Baize, Brad ;
Simone, Andrea ;
Menon, Mani .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) :677-685
[36]   The natural history of voiding function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Wang, Lushun ;
Chung, Stephanie Fook-Chong Man ;
Yip, Sidney Kam Hung ;
Lau, Weber Kam On ;
Cheng, Christopher Wai Sam ;
Sim, Hong Gee .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (02) :177-182
[37]   Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005 [J].
Su, Li-Ming .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) :130-135
[38]   A prognostic model for predicting urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Honda, Masashi ;
Kawamoto, Bunya ;
Morizane, Shuichi ;
Hikita, Katsuya ;
Muraoka, Kuniyasu ;
Sejima, Takehiro ;
Takenaka, Atsushi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03)
[39]   Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis [J].
Jiang, Yu-Li ;
Zheng, Gao-Feng ;
Jiang, Ze-Peng ;
Zhen-Li ;
Zhou, Xie-Lai ;
Zhou, Jin ;
Ye, Chun-Hua ;
Wang, Kang-Er .
BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[40]   Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Murphy, Declan G. ;
Challacombe, Benjamin J. ;
Costello, Anthony J. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) :94-99