Simple Method to Predict Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:15
作者
Skarecky, Douglas [1 ]
Morales, Blanca [1 ]
Chang, Alexandra [1 ]
Ahlering, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; URINARY CONTINENCE; URETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS; RECONSTRUCTION; PRESERVATION; FEASIBILITY; RESTORATION; OUTCOMES; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2011.0013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: After removal of the Foley catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), recovery of continence can take days to months. We sought to identify a simple means to predict time to recovery of postoperative continence. Patients and Methods: Preoperative characteristics on 172 men who were undergoing RARP were entered into an electronic database. All men were queried via telephone and/or returned a 7-day log of pad use. Men without need for pads were excluded (n = 41). At 4 to 7 days, responses were grouped as: one pad (n = 55), two pads (n = 35), or three or more pads (n = 41). Patients returned self-addressed postcards noting the date of 0-pad urinary status. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables were assessed for ability to predict time to continence. Results: No preoperative factors, such as age, International Index of Erectile Function-5, prostate-specific antigen level, American Urological Association symptom score, body mass index, uroflowmetry, nerve-sparing status, estimated blood loss, or prostate weight, were found to predict time to continence. Pad use at 4 to 7 days, however, was highly correlated with median time to continence. The median time to continence for men using one pad was 35 days, two pads was 42 days, and for three or more pads was 73 days (P = 0.0001). Conclusions: As has been previously reported, we found no reliable baseline factors that predicted postoperative time to 0-pad continence. We did find that determining pad usage at 4 to 7 days after catheter removal strongly predicted time to pad-free continence. This method is simpler then pad weights, predicts high-and low-risk men for delayed continence, and can be used for counseling/intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1455
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preoperative and Intraoperative Measurements of Urethral Length as Predictors of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Hakimi, A. Ari
    Faleck, David M.
    Agalliu, Ilir
    Rozenblit, Alla M.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Ghavamian, Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (06) : 1025 - 1030
  • [32] Impact of modified bladder neck suspension on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
    Moon, Hyong Woo
    Rhew, Seung Ah
    Yoon, Chang Eil
    Kwon, Hyeok Jae
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Lee, Ji Youl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (05) : 2279 - 2285
  • [33] Robot-Assisted radical Prostatectomy
    Wagner, Christian
    Addali, Mustapha
    Witt, Joern H.
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) : 483 - 497
  • [34] A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Jeong, Wooju
    Prasad, Madhu-Ashni
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Diaz, Mireya
    Karabon, Patrick
    Sammon, Jesse
    Jamil, Marcus
    Baize, Brad
    Simone, Andrea
    Menon, Mani
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 677 - 685
  • [35] The natural history of voiding function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Wang, Lushun
    Chung, Stephanie Fook-Chong Man
    Yip, Sidney Kam Hung
    Lau, Weber Kam On
    Cheng, Christopher Wai Sam
    Sim, Hong Gee
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [36] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005
    Su, Li-Ming
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 130 - 135
  • [37] A prognostic model for predicting urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Honda, Masashi
    Kawamoto, Bunya
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Hikita, Katsuya
    Muraoka, Kuniyasu
    Sejima, Takehiro
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03)
  • [38] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu-Li
    Zheng, Gao-Feng
    Jiang, Ze-Peng
    Zhen-Li
    Zhou, Xie-Lai
    Zhou, Jin
    Ye, Chun-Hua
    Wang, Kang-Er
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [40] Feasibility and continence outcomes of extended prostatic urethral preservation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Nunez Bragayrac, Luciano A.
    Hussein, Ahmed A.
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Pop, Elena
    James, Gaybrielle
    Osei, Jennifer
    Murekeysoni, Christine
    Kauffman, Eric C.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2020, 23 (02) : 286 - 294