Simple Method to Predict Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:15
作者
Skarecky, Douglas [1 ]
Morales, Blanca [1 ]
Chang, Alexandra [1 ]
Ahlering, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; URINARY CONTINENCE; URETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS; RECONSTRUCTION; PRESERVATION; FEASIBILITY; RESTORATION; OUTCOMES; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2011.0013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: After removal of the Foley catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), recovery of continence can take days to months. We sought to identify a simple means to predict time to recovery of postoperative continence. Patients and Methods: Preoperative characteristics on 172 men who were undergoing RARP were entered into an electronic database. All men were queried via telephone and/or returned a 7-day log of pad use. Men without need for pads were excluded (n = 41). At 4 to 7 days, responses were grouped as: one pad (n = 55), two pads (n = 35), or three or more pads (n = 41). Patients returned self-addressed postcards noting the date of 0-pad urinary status. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables were assessed for ability to predict time to continence. Results: No preoperative factors, such as age, International Index of Erectile Function-5, prostate-specific antigen level, American Urological Association symptom score, body mass index, uroflowmetry, nerve-sparing status, estimated blood loss, or prostate weight, were found to predict time to continence. Pad use at 4 to 7 days, however, was highly correlated with median time to continence. The median time to continence for men using one pad was 35 days, two pads was 42 days, and for three or more pads was 73 days (P = 0.0001). Conclusions: As has been previously reported, we found no reliable baseline factors that predicted postoperative time to 0-pad continence. We did find that determining pad usage at 4 to 7 days after catheter removal strongly predicted time to pad-free continence. This method is simpler then pad weights, predicts high-and low-risk men for delayed continence, and can be used for counseling/intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1455
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of a Risk-stratified Grade of Nerve-sparing Technique on Early Return of Continence After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Chopra, Sameer
    Pham, Anthony
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Durand, Matthieu
    Chughtai, Bilal
    Gruschow, Siobhan
    Peyser, Alexandra
    Harneja, Niyati
    Leung, Robert
    Lee, Richard
    Herman, Michael
    Robinson, Brian
    Shevchuk, Maria
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (03) : 438 - 444
  • [22] Factors Affecting Return of Continence 3 Months After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis From a Large, Prospective Data by a Single Surgeon
    Ko, Young Hwii
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Cheon, Jun
    Patel, Vipul R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (01) : 190 - 194
  • [23] Balancing continence function and oncological outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
    Mottrie, Alexander
    Gallina, Andrea
    De Wil, Peter
    Thueer, David
    Novara, Giacomo
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (6B) : 999 - 1006
  • [24] Urinary continence in high-risk prostate cancer after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Wu, Xiaobo
    Wong, Chris Ho-Ming
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2023, 33 (06) : 482 - 487
  • [25] Inguinal hernia leads to worse immediate urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Ozawa, Yu
    Aoki, Keisuke
    Koike, Shin
    Gozu, Shu
    Yokoyama, Takaaki
    Yamada, Masumi
    Odagaki, Yu
    Hisatome, Yuko
    Sakamoto, Hideo
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [26] Predictors of Early Continence After Single-port Transvesical Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Pedraza, Adriana
    Mikesell, Carter
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2024, 184 : 176 - 181
  • [27] Association of bi-parametric MRI measures with continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Nolsoe, Alexander B.
    Logager, Vibeke
    Boesen, Lars
    Ostergren, Peter Busch
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Jensen, Christian Fuglesang S.
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Sonksen, Jens
    Fode, Mikkel
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (04) : 603 - 610
  • [28] Urinary continence outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Significance of anterior reconstruction
    Funajima, Keisuke
    Naito, Sei
    Fukai, Atsushi
    Narisawa, Takafumi
    Fukuhara, Hiroki
    Suenaga, Shinta
    Takai, Yuki
    Takai, Satoshi
    Yagi, Mayu
    Kanno, Hidenori
    Yamagishi, Atsushi
    Nishida, Hayato
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, : 355 - 360
  • [29] Urinary Continence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Using the Peritoneal Fixation Technique
    Terao, Hideyuki
    Nagasaka, Hirotaka
    Yamamoto, Shotaro
    Suzuki, Atsuto
    Usui, Kimitsugu
    Kishida, Takeshi
    Nakaigawa, Noboru
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [30] Preoperative and Intraoperative Measurements of Urethral Length as Predictors of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Hakimi, A. Ari
    Faleck, David M.
    Agalliu, Ilir
    Rozenblit, Alla M.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Ghavamian, Reza
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (06) : 1025 - 1030