Simple Method to Predict Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:15
作者
Skarecky, Douglas [1 ]
Morales, Blanca [1 ]
Chang, Alexandra [1 ]
Ahlering, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; URINARY CONTINENCE; URETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS; RECONSTRUCTION; PRESERVATION; FEASIBILITY; RESTORATION; OUTCOMES; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2011.0013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: After removal of the Foley catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), recovery of continence can take days to months. We sought to identify a simple means to predict time to recovery of postoperative continence. Patients and Methods: Preoperative characteristics on 172 men who were undergoing RARP were entered into an electronic database. All men were queried via telephone and/or returned a 7-day log of pad use. Men without need for pads were excluded (n = 41). At 4 to 7 days, responses were grouped as: one pad (n = 55), two pads (n = 35), or three or more pads (n = 41). Patients returned self-addressed postcards noting the date of 0-pad urinary status. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables were assessed for ability to predict time to continence. Results: No preoperative factors, such as age, International Index of Erectile Function-5, prostate-specific antigen level, American Urological Association symptom score, body mass index, uroflowmetry, nerve-sparing status, estimated blood loss, or prostate weight, were found to predict time to continence. Pad use at 4 to 7 days, however, was highly correlated with median time to continence. The median time to continence for men using one pad was 35 days, two pads was 42 days, and for three or more pads was 73 days (P = 0.0001). Conclusions: As has been previously reported, we found no reliable baseline factors that predicted postoperative time to 0-pad continence. We did find that determining pad usage at 4 to 7 days after catheter removal strongly predicted time to pad-free continence. This method is simpler then pad weights, predicts high-and low-risk men for delayed continence, and can be used for counseling/intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1455
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Lavigueur-Blouin, Hugo
    Noriega, Alina Camacho
    Valdivieso, Roger
    Hueber, Pierre-Alain
    Bienz, Marc
    Alhathal, Naif
    Latour, Mathieu
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (1-2): : E93 - E97
  • [2] Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 287 - 291
  • [3] Pelvic Anatomy on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Predict Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Mendoza, Pierre J.
    Stern, Joshua M.
    Li, Amy Y.
    Jaffe, William
    Kovell, Robert
    Nguyen, Mary
    Natale, Rachel
    Monahan, Kelly
    Bergey, Meredith R.
    Lee, David I.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [4] Systematic review on urinary continence rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Geraghty, Keith
    Keane, Kevin
    Davis, Niall
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (03) : 1603 - 1612
  • [5] Anterior and Posterior Reconstruction Technique and Its Impact on Early Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Atug, Fatih
    Kural, Ali Riza
    Tufek, Ilter
    Srivastav, Sudesh
    Akpinar, Haluk
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (04) : 381 - 386
  • [6] Urinary continence recovery after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Iannetti, Alessandro
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (07) : 875 - 876
  • [7] Surgical techniques to preserve continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Katsimperis, Stamatios
    Juliebo-Jones, Patrick
    Ta, Anthony
    Tandogdu, Zafer
    Al-Bermani, Osama
    Bellos, Themistoklis
    Esperto, Francesco
    Tonyali, Senol
    Mitsogiannis, Iraklis
    Skolarikos, Andreas
    Varkarakis, Ioannis
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Tzelves, Lazaros
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [8] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Artibani, Walter
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Costello, Anthony
    Menon, Mani
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Van der Poel, Henk
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 405 - 417
  • [9] Postoperative cystogram findings predict recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Fukui, Shinji
    Kagebayashi, Yoriaki
    Iemura, Yusuke
    Matsumura, Yoshiaki
    Samma, Shoji
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2019, 11 (03) : 143 - 150
  • [10] Surgical techniques to improve continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Urkmez, Ahmet
    Ranasinghe, Weranja
    Davis, John W.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) : 3036 - 3048