Multi-hazards vulnerability assessment of southern coasts of Iran

被引:52
作者
Mafi-Gholami, Davood [1 ]
Zenner, Eric K. [2 ]
Jaafari, Abolfazl [3 ]
Bakhtyari, Hamid Reza Riyahi [1 ]
Dieu Tien Bui [4 ]
机构
[1] Shahrekord Univ, Fac Nat Resources & Earth Sci, Dept Forest Sci, Shahrekord, Iran
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, Forest Resources Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] AREEO, Res Inst Forests & Rangelands, Tehran, Iran
[4] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
关键词
Vulnerability assessment; Coastal vulnerability index; Northern coast of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman; SEA-LEVEL RISE; CLIMATE-CHANGE VULNERABILITY; SOCIETAL VULNERABILITY; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; INDEX; RESILIENCE; BANGLADESH; CAMEROON; IMPACTS; DROUGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109628
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coastal vulnerability assessment has become one of the most important tools for decision making and providing effective managerial solutions to reduce adverse socio-economic impacts of multiple environmental hazards on coupled social-ecological systems of coastal areas. The aim of this study was to assess the vulnerability of the northern coasts of the Persian Gulf (PG) and the Gulf of Oman (GO) in the Hormozgan province of Iran. Nine variables of vulnerability that included the rate of coastline change, relative sea level rise, coastal slope, mean tidal range, coastal geomorphology, significant wave height (SWH), extreme storm surge, population density, and fishing intensity were weighted, mapped, and combined into the Coastal vulnerability index (CVI). Experts viewed sea level rise, shoreline change and extreme storm surge as most important for imparting vulnerabilities on the northern coasts of PG and GO. Socio-economic variables (i.e., population density and fishery intensity) were considered least important. Of the total length of the provincial shoreline, 27% were classified into the very low vulnerability class, 31% into the low, 17.4% into the moderate, 15.4% into the high, and 9.2% into the very high vulnerability class. About 1295 km (58%) of shorelines were classified into the low and very low vulnerability classes (CVI value <= 8.32) and mainly consisted of shorelines on the western coast along the PG. In contrast, 553 km (24.6%) of shorelines were classified into the high and very high vulnerability classes (CVI values > 13.39) and were located along the central coasts (especially in the Qeshm Island and Strait of Hormuz) and on the east coasts of the GO. At least a quarter of all shorelines in the province have high and very high vulnerability to environmental hazards that are the harbingers of climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [31] Harvey N., 1999, AUST GEOGR STUD, V37, P50, DOI 10.1111/1467-8470.00065
  • [32] Impact of human interventions on coastal and marine geological hazards: a review
    Huang, Yu
    Jin, Peng
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 77 (03) : 1081 - 1090
  • [33] Coastal multi-hazard vulnerability assessment along the Ganges deltaic coast of Bangladesh-A geospatial approach
    Islam, Md. Ashraful
    Mitra, Debashis
    Dewan, Ashraf
    Akhter, Syed Humayun
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 127 : 1 - 15
  • [34] Assessing coastal vulnerability: Development of a combined physical and economic index
    Kantamaneni, Komali
    Phillips, Michael
    Thomas, Tony
    Jenkins, Rhian
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 158 : 164 - 175
  • [35] Assessment of the sensitivity of the southern coast of the Gulf of Corinth (Peloponnese, Greece) to sea-level rise
    Karymbalis, Efthimios
    Chalkias, Christos
    Chalkias, George
    Grigoropoulou, Eleni
    Manthos, George
    Ferentinou, Maria
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 4 (04): : 561 - 577
  • [36] Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management
    Koks, E. E.
    Jongman, B.
    Husby, T. G.
    Botzen, W. J. W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 47 : 42 - 52
  • [37] Coastal Vulnerability Assessment for Orissa State, East Coast of India
    Kumar, T. Srinivasa
    Mahendra, R. S.
    Nayak, Shailesh
    Radhakrishnan, K.
    Sahu, K. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 26 (03) : 523 - 534
  • [38] Multi-hazards coastal vulnerability assessment of Goa, India, using geospatial techniques
    Kunte, Pravin D.
    Jauhari, Nitesh
    Mehrotra, Utkarsh
    Kotha, Mahender
    Hursthouse, Andrew S.
    Gagnon, Alexandre S.
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 95 : 264 - 281
  • [39] Fostering coastal resilience to climate change vulnerability in Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon and Uruguay: a cross-country comparison
    Leal Filho, Walter
    Modesto, Francine
    Nagy, Gustavo J.
    Saroar, Mustafa
    YannickToamukum, Nsani
    Ha'apio, Michael
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2018, 23 (04) : 579 - 602
  • [40] A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico
    Luers, AL
    Lobell, DB
    Sklar, LS
    Addams, CL
    Matson, PA
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2003, 13 (04): : 255 - 267