Institutions and Agency in the Sustainability of Day-to-Day Consumption Practices: An Institutional Ethnographic Study

被引:13
作者
Pekkanen, Tiia-Lotta [1 ]
机构
[1] LUT Univ, Sch Business & Management, POB 20, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Sustainable consumption; Practices; Institutional ethnography; Agency; Culture; Cultural context; Institutions; Informal institutions; Unintended sustainability behaviour; WOOD PRODUCTS; COMMUNITY-ENERGY; LIFE-STYLES; TRANSITIONS; CONSUMERS; BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION; INNOVATIONS; PERSPECTIVE; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-019-04419-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumption is essentially an institutional action. While both the formal institutional environment and cultural embeddedness shape consumption, individuals may reciprocally amend the institutional setting through consumption choices that challenge the prevalent institutional constraints. This paper reconciles theoretical and conceptual premises from institutional and practice theory literature to study the sustainability of consumption. Using institutional ethnography as a methodological approach, the study explores the pendulum between embeddedness and agency in shaping the sustainability of day-to-day consumption of necessary goods; and further, how the external institutional environment may interact with human behaviour to contribute towards sustainability. The study finds a hierarchy of informal institutions, each level of which interacts differently with external changes. For example, sustainability is found to be more widespread the more it is embedded in practices, and this is a result of overall institutional development beyond regulation and choice editing. The results also highlight the importance of understanding unintentional sustainability in consumption practices.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 260
页数:20
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation [J].
Abrahamse, W ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C ;
Rothengatter, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :273-291
[2]   Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism [J].
Akenji, Lewis .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 63 :13-23
[3]   Culture and Institutions [J].
Alesina, Alberto ;
Giuliano, Paola .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2015, 53 (04) :898-944
[4]   Critical sustainable consumption: a research agenda [J].
Anantharaman M. .
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2018, 8 (4) :553-561
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, DOI DOI 10.1080/1042771042000298706
[6]   Why environmentally conscious consumers do not purchase green products A cognitive mapping approach [J].
Barbarossa, Camilla ;
Pastore, Alberto .
QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (02) :188-209
[7]   ENTREPRENEURSHIP - PRODUCTIVE, UNPRODUCTIVE, AND DESTRUCTIVE [J].
BAUMOL, WJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) :893-921
[8]  
BERG BR, 2001, QUALITATIVE RES METH, pCH11
[9]  
Bernard HR., 2002, Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, V3rd
[10]  
Bourdieu P., 1990, The Logic of Practice, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511812507