Algebraic Techniques for Short(er) Exact Lattice-Based Zero-Knowledge Proofs

被引:63
作者
Bootle, Jonathan [1 ]
Lyubashevsky, Vadim [1 ]
Seiler, Gregor [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IBM Res Zurich, Ruschlikon, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - CRYPTO 2019, PT 1 | 2019年 / 11692卷
关键词
Lattices; Zero-knowledge proofs; Commitments;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-26948-7_7
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A key component of many lattice-based protocols is a zeroknowledge proof of knowledge of a vector (s) over right arrow with small coefficients satisfying A (s) over right arrow = (u) over right arrow mod q. While there exist fairly efficient proofs for a relaxed version of this equation which prove the knowledge of (s) over right arrow' and c satisfying A (s) over right arrow' = (u) over right arrowc where parallel to(s) over right arrow'parallel to >> parallel to(s) over right arrow parallel to and c is some small element in the ring over which the proof is performed, the proofs for the exact version of the equation are considerably less practical. The best such proof technique is an adaptation of Stern's protocol (Crypto '93), for proving knowledge of nearby codewords, to larger moduli. The scheme is a Sigma-protocol, each of whose iterations has soundness error 2/3, and thus requires over 200 repetitions to obtain soundness error of 2(-128), which is the main culprit behind the large size of the proofs produced. In this paper, we propose the first lattice-based proof system that significantly outperforms Stern-type proofs for proving knowledge of a short (s) over right arrow satisfying A (s) over right arrow = (u) over right arrow mod q. Unlike Stern's proof, which is combinatorial in nature, our proof is more algebraic and uses various relaxed zero-knowledge proofs as sub-routines. The main savings in our proof system comes from the fact that each round has soundness error of 1/n, where n is the number of columns of A. For typical applications, n is a few thousand, and therefore our proof needs to be repeated around 10 times to achieve a soundness error of 2(-128). For concrete parameters, it produces proofs that are around an order of magnitude smaller than those produced using Stern's approach.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 202
页数:27
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   Lattice-Based Group Signatures and Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Automorphism Stability [J].
del Pino, Rafael ;
Lyubashevsky, Vadim ;
Seiler, Gregor .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM SIGSAC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (CCS'18), 2018, :574-591
[12]  
Ducas L, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8616, P335, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44371-2_19
[13]   Fully Homomorphic Encryption Using Ideal Lattices [J].
Gentry, Craig .
STOC'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2009, :169-178
[14]   One-Out-of-Many Proofs: Or How to Leak a Secret and Spend a Coin [J].
Groth, Jens ;
Kohlweiss, Markulf .
ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2015, PT II, 2015, 9057 :253-280
[15]   A Verifiable Secret Shuffle of Homomorphic Encryptions [J].
Groth, Jens .
JOURNAL OF CRYPTOLOGY, 2010, 23 (04) :546-579
[16]  
Kawachi A, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5350, P372, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89255-7_23
[17]   Constant-Size Group Signatures from Lattices [J].
Ling, San ;
Khoa Nguyen ;
Wang, Huaxiong ;
Xu, Yanhong .
PUBLIC-KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY - PKC 2018, PT II, 2018, 10770 :58-88
[18]  
Ling S, 2013, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V7778, P107, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-36362-7_8
[19]  
Lyubashevsky V, 2013, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V7881, P35, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_3
[20]  
Lyubashevsky V, 2012, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V7237, P738, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_43