Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances

被引:2
作者
Angelopoulos, Gerassimos G. [1 ]
Kanarelis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Vagdouti, Georgia [1 ]
Zavlanou, Ageliki [1 ]
Sifakakis, Iosif [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, 2 Thivon Str, Athens 11527, Greece
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 21期
关键词
orthodontic; lingual; aligners; quality of life; speech; ADULT PATIENTS ADJUSTABILITY; PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS; RECOVERY; PATIENT; PAIN; DISCOMFORT; EXPOSURE; TEETH;
D O I
10.3390/app112110074
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The aim of this prospective study was to compare a fixed lingual orthodontic appliance with a commonly used aligner system, focusing on oral impacts and speech disturbances, during the first 3 months of orthodontic treatment. Two groups of adults were evaluated: 21 treated with Invisalign(R) and 26 with In-Ovation L lingual brackets. Health-related quality of life questionnaires were used to assess the oral impacts, and speech samples were collected for speech evaluation by professionals. The levels of pain and painkiller intake were similar, increasing on the first day, and decreasing at 3 months. Subtle injuries on the lip and cheeks were initially reported in the aligner group. Lingual patients experienced more discomfort in swallowing and opening the mouth, tongue injuries and food residues, even at 3 months. The consonants "s " and "z " were mainly affected in both groups immediately after appliance insertion, but more often in the aligner group. These speech disturbances recovered in the following 3 months. In conclusion, both groups reported disturbances in quality-of-life measures; however, patients wearing lingual appliances experienced more disturbances, which persisted after three months. Speech disturbances were slightly more pronounced in the aligner group and recovered after three months.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Youth Perception of Different Orthodontic Appliances [J].
Alansari, Reem A. .
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2020, 14 :1011-1019
[2]   Adverse effects of lingual and buccal orthodontic techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ata-Ali, Fadi ;
Ata-Ali, Javier ;
Ferrer-Molina, Marcela ;
Cobo, Teresa ;
De Carlos, Felix ;
Cobo, Juan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 149 (06) :820-829
[3]   The theory of reasoned action and patient compliance during orthodontic treatment [J].
Bos, A ;
Hoogstraten, J ;
Prahl-Andersen, B .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 33 (06) :419-426
[4]  
Brascher AK, 2016, J OROFAC ORTHOP, V77, P432, DOI 10.1007/s00056-016-0051-3
[5]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDEX OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT PRIORITY [J].
BROOK, PH ;
SHAW, WC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1989, 11 (03) :309-320
[6]  
Caniklioglu C, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P86
[7]   Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review [J].
Cardoso, Paula Coutinho ;
Espinosa, Daybelis Gonzalez ;
Mecenas, Paulo ;
Flores-Mir, Carlos ;
Normando, David .
PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 21 (01)
[8]   Patients' perceptions of recovery after exposure of impacted teeth with a closed-eruption technique [J].
Chaushu, G ;
Becker, A ;
Zeltser, R ;
Branski, S ;
Chaushu, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 125 (06) :690-696
[9]   Patients' perceptions of recovery after routine extraction of healthy premolars [J].
Chaushu, Gavriel ;
Becker, Adrian ;
Zeltser, Rafael ;
Vasker, Naomi ;
Branski, Sari ;
Chaushu, Stella .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 131 (02) :170-175
[10]   Patients' perception of recovery after exposure of impacted teeth: A comparison of closed- versus open-eruption techniques [J].
Chaushu, S ;
Becker, A ;
Zeltser, R ;
Branski, S ;
Vasker, N ;
Chaushu, G .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (03) :323-329