Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): experience from Australia

被引:102
作者
Allen, Cameron [3 ,5 ]
Reid, Michael [3 ]
Thwaites, John [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Glover, Rod [1 ,2 ]
Kestin, Tahl [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Sustainable Dev Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Natl Sustainable Dev Council, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] SDG Transforming Australia Project, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Sustainable Dev Solut Network SDSN Australia New, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Evidence-based policy; Sustainability assessment; Indicator-based assessment; Targets and indicators; BASE-LINES; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; INDEXES; GAPS;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-019-00711-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a comprehensive and integrated framework of targets and indicators to support national planning and reporting through until 2030. Interest in the SDGs is growing, as seen by the emergence of a range of data-driven assessments of progress, gaps and opportunities for achieving the SDGs. Despite this growing momentum, few national governments have completed their own evidence-based assessment of progress. This paper explores the method and results from an independent, evidence-based assessment of Australia's progress towards the SDGs. The assessment evaluates Australia's progress across 86 SDG targets and 144 corresponding indicators which were selected through an expert-driven, consultative process. The study uses a novel approach combining several contemporary methods to produce a comprehensive assessment of national progress on the SDGs. The results show that Australia has mixed performance on the SDGs, with strong progress in goals relating to health and education undermined by poor progress in goals relating to climate action and reducing inequalities. By comparing our results against other recent assessments of Australia's progress, we observe that SDG assessment results are highly sensitive to the selection of indicators and assessment methods. Our assessment addresses these sensitivities by maintaining the integrity of the SDG framework and a clear linkage to official targets and indicators, while also having regard for national priorities and relevance. The study provides a timely contribution to research in the emerging field of evidence-based assessments of national progress on the SDGs.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 538
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
ACFID ACOSS GCNA and SDSN, 2016, AUSTR SDGS SUMM ROAD
[2]   Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages [J].
Allen, Cameron ;
Metternicht, Graciela ;
Wiedmann, Thomas .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (02) :421-438
[3]   Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries [J].
Allen, Cameron ;
Metternicht, Graciela ;
Wiedmann, Thomas .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (05) :1453-1467
[4]   Indicator-based assessments of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a case study from the Arab region [J].
Allen, Cameron ;
Nejdawi, Reem ;
El-Baba, Jana ;
Hamati, Kamil ;
Metternicht, Graciela ;
Wiedmann, Thomas .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2017, 12 (06) :975-989
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, REPORT INT C
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUST OUTL MONG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IND SUST DEV GUID ME
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict in Iraq, S/2015/852
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SDG INDEX DASHBOARDS
[10]  
Astleithner F, 2004, J HOUS BUILT ENVIRON, V19, P7, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:JOHO.0000017704.49593.00