Is mealworm or shrimp allergy indicative for food allergy to insects?

被引:76
作者
Broekman, Henrike C. H. P. [1 ]
Knulst, Andre C. [1 ]
de Jong, Govardus [2 ]
Gaspari, Marco [3 ]
Jager, Constance F. den Hartog [1 ]
Houben, Geert F. [1 ,2 ]
Verhoeckx, Kitty C. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Dermatol Allergol, 14 POB 85500,Internal Mail G02-124, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Zeist, Netherlands
[3] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Catanzaro, Italy
关键词
Allergenic potency; Cross reactivity; Edible Insects; Insect food allergy; Primary mealworm allergy; ARGININE KINASE; OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGY; MAJOR ALLERGEN; TROPOMYOSIN; IDENTIFICATION; PREVALENCE; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1002/mnfr.201601061
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Scope: The growing world population is a key driver for the exploration of sustainable protein sources to ensure food security. Mealworm and other insects are promising candidates. Previously we found that shrimp allergic patients are at risk for mealworm allergy, and that mealworm can induce a primary allergy [3]. This study set out to investigate the allergenic potential of edible insects, suggested for human consumption by agencies such as WHO/FAO, in both the shrimp (potentially cross-reactive) and primary mealworm allergic population. The following insects were studied: mealworm, house cricket, giant mealworm, lesser mealworm, African grasshopper, large wax moth, and black soldier fly. Methods and results: Fifteen shrimp (mealworm sensitized or allergic) patients and four primary mealworm allergic subjects, who participated in previous studies, were included. All shrimp allergic patients were sensitized to multiple insects with similar response profiles for all insects tested. Primary mealworm allergic patients, showed IgE binding to proteins from only a few insects on immunoblot, although basophil activation test was positive for all tested insects. Conclusion: Shrimp allergic patients are most likely at risk of food allergy to mealworm and other insects. Primary mealworm allergy does not mean subjects are likely to react to all insects.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Sequence studies of proteins from larval and pupal cuticle of the yellow meal worm, Tenebrio molitor [J].
Andersen, SO ;
Rafn, K ;
Roepstorff, P .
INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 27 (02) :121-131
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FAO FORESTRY PAPER
[3]   Molecular and immunological characterization of arginine kinase from the indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella, a novel cross-reactive invertebrate pan-allergen [J].
Binder, M ;
Mahler, V ;
Hayek, B ;
Sperr, WR ;
Schöller, M ;
Prozell, S ;
Wiedermann, G ;
Valent, P ;
Valenta, R ;
Duchêne, M .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 167 (09) :5470-5477
[4]  
Broekman H. C., 2017, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN, Patent No. S0091-6749, 30340-30348
[5]   Majority of shrimp-allergic patients are allergic to mealworm [J].
Broekman, Henrike ;
Verhoeckx, Kitty C. ;
Jager, Constance F. den Hartog ;
Kruizinga, Astrid G. ;
Pronk-Kleinjan, Marieke ;
Remington, Benjamin C. ;
Bruijnzeel-Koomen, Carla A. ;
Houben, Geert F. ;
Knulst, Andre C. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 137 (04) :1261-+
[6]   Effect of thermal processing on mealworm allergenicity [J].
Broekman, Henrike ;
Knulst, Andre ;
Jager, Stans den Hartog ;
Monteleone, Francesca ;
Gaspari, Marco ;
de Jong, Govardus ;
Houben, Geert ;
Verhoeckx, Kitty .
MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2015, 59 (09) :1855-1864
[7]   Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed EFSA Scientific Committee [J].
EFSA Scientific Committee .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (10)
[8]  
FAO/WHO, 2009, FOOD DER MOD BIOT
[9]   Specific sensitization to the common housefly (Musca domestica) not related to insect panallergy [J].
Focke, M ;
Hemmer, W ;
Wöhrl, S ;
Götz, M ;
Jarisch, R ;
Kofler, H .
ALLERGY, 2003, 58 (05) :448-451
[10]   Anaphylaxis to the ingestion and inhalation of Tenebrio molitor (mealworm) and Zophobas morio (superworm) [J].
Freye, HB ;
Esch, RE ;
Litwin, CM ;
Sorkin, L .
ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 17 (04) :215-219