Intensity of adoption of integrated pest management practices in Rwanda: A fractional logit approach

被引:18
作者
Misango, Vincent Gadamba [1 ,2 ]
Nzuma, Jonathan Makau [1 ]
Irungu, Patrick [1 ]
Kassie, Menale [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nairobi, Dept Agr Econ, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol Icipe, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
Fall armyworm; Fractional logit model; Intensity of adoption; Push-pull technology; Stemborer; PUSH-PULL TECHNOLOGY; RESPONSE VARIABLES; CEREAL STEMBORERS; DIFFUSION; PERCEPTIONS; MODEL; FARMERS; POVERTY; LOSSES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08735
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The push-pull technology (PPT) is considered as an alternative integrated pest management strategy for the control of fall armyworm and stemborer, among smallholder maize farmers in sub-Sahara African to conventional pesticides. However, the extent of PPT use in Rwanda where the technology was introduced in 2017 remains largely unexplored. This paper employed a fractional logit model to assess the factors influencing the intensity of adoption of PPT among smallholder maize farmers in Gatsibo and Nyagatare districts of Rwanda using survey data obtained from 194 PPT adopter households selected using a cluster sampling technique. While only 5 percent of smallholder farmers in Rwanda have adopted PPT as an integrated pest management strategy, on the average, these farmers cultivated 26 percent of their maize plots to the technology. Our results show that the perceived benefits of PPT, its perceived effectiveness in pest control, group membership, livestock ownership, and gender of the farmer had significant effects on the intensity of adoption of the PPT in Rwanda. These findings give compelling evidence to recommend that development initiatives should give emphasis on creating awareness on the perceived benefits of PPT adoption using group approaches that are gender disaggregated.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Unpacking Postharvest Losses in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis
    Affognon, Hippolyte
    Mutlingi, Christopher
    Sanginga, Pascal
    Borgemeister, Christian
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 66 : 49 - 68
  • [2] AGRA [Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa], 2014, NAIROBI, V216
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1985, AP GUIDE EC
  • [4] Awuni J. A., 2018, Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V21, P48
  • [5] Ex-post economic analysis of push-pull technology in Eastern Uganda
    Chepchirchir, Ruth T.
    Macharia, Ibrahim
    Murage, Alice W.
    Midega, Charles A. O.
    Khan, Zeyaur R.
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2018, 112 : 356 - 362
  • [6] Impact assessment of push-pull pest management on incomes, productivity and poverty among smallholder households in Eastern Uganda
    Chepchirchir, Ruth T.
    Macharia, Ibrahim
    Murage, Alice W.
    Midega, Charles A. O.
    Khan, Zeyaur R.
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2017, 9 (06) : 1359 - 1372
  • [7] The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management
    Cook, Samantha M.
    Khan, Zeyaur R.
    Pickett, John A.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2007, 52 : 375 - 400
  • [8] Day R., 2017, Outlooks on Pest Management, V28, P196, DOI 10.1564/v28_oct_02
  • [9] Gallani S., 2015, 16016 HARV BUS SCH
  • [10] Ghimire R., 2015, International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, V4, P139