Screening instruments for detecting illicit drug use/abuse that could be useful in general hospital wards: A systematic review

被引:52
作者
Mdege, Noreen D. [1 ]
Lang, Jenny [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Addict Unit, Leeds LS2 9NG, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Screening; Illicit drugs; Hospital; Validity; Reliability; Systematic review; DISORDERS IDENTIFICATION TEST; ALCOHOL-USE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SUBSTANCE DEPENDENCE; BRIEF INTERVENTIONS; ABUSE; VALIDATION; ADULTS; RELIABILITY; INPATIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Aim: To identify and describe screening instruments for detecting illicit drug use/abuse that are appropriate for use in general hospital wards and review evidence for reliability, validity, feasibility and acceptability. Methods: Instruments were identified from a number of screening instrument databases/libraries and Google Scholar. They were independently assessed for eligibility by two reviewers. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCINFO, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles published up to February 2010. Two reviewers independently assessed the identified articles for eligibility and extracted data from the eligible studies. Results: 13 instruments, ASSIST, CAGE-AID, DAST. DHQ/PDHQ DUDIT, DUS, NMASSIST, SIP-AD, SDS, SMAST-AID, SSI-SA, TICS and UNCOPE were included in the review. They had 2 to 28 items and took less than 10 min to administer and score. Evidence on validity, reliability, acceptability and feasibility of instruments in adult patients not known to have a substance abuse problem was scarce. Of the 21 studies included in the review, only one included participants from general hospital wards. Reported sensitivity, specificity and predictive values varied widely both between studies of the same instrument and also between different instruments. No study was identified comparing two or more of the included instruments. Conclusion: The review identified and described 13 instruments that could be useful in general hospital wards. There is however lack of evaluation of illicit drug use screening instruments in general hospital wards. Currently clinicians or researchers searching for a simple, reliable, general screening instrument for current drug use to guide practice or research in general hospital wards do not have enough comparative evidence to choose between the available measures. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1119
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Ali R, 2002, ADDICTION, V97, P1183
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, ADDICTION, DOI DOI 10.1111/ADD.15782
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MEASURING DIFFERENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WORLD HLTH REPORT 20
[5]   Substance misuse in psychiatric inpatients: comparison of a screening questionnaire survey with case notes [J].
Barnaby, B ;
Drummond, C ;
McCloud, A ;
Burns, T ;
Orrm, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7418) :783-784
[6]   Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in criminal justice and detoxification settings and in a Swedish population sample [J].
Berman, AH ;
Bergman, H ;
Palmstierna, T ;
Schlyter, F .
EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (01) :22-31
[7]   Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use [J].
Bernstein, J ;
Bernstein, E ;
Tassiopoulos, K ;
Heeren, T ;
Levenson, S ;
Hingson, R .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2005, 77 (01) :49-59
[8]   Assessing consequences of substance use: Psychometric properties of the inventory of drug use consequences [J].
Blanchard, KA ;
Morgenstern, J ;
Morgan, TJ ;
Labouvie, EW ;
Bux, DA .
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2003, 17 (04) :328-331
[9]  
Brown R L, 1995, Wis Med J, V94, P135
[10]  
Brown R L, 2001, J Am Board Fam Pract, V14, P95