Percolation characteristics of a water-repellent sandy forest soil

被引:46
作者
Wessolek, G. [1 ]
Schwaerzel, K. [2 ]
Greiffenhagen, A. [1 ]
Stoffregen, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Soil Sci & Soil Protect, Inst Ecol, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Soil Sci & Site Ecol, D-01737 Dresden, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00980.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
In a tracer experiment TDR transect measurements were made to study percolation behaviour in a 120-year-old pine stand (Pinus sylvestris) on a water-repellent sandy soil (Haplic Arenosol). The experiment (with potassium iodide) showed an 80% labelling of the total flow in organic layers, whereas the area of transport in the mineral soil was sharply reduced to 12-30%. The average diameters of these preferential flow paths were about 8-15 cm. The TDR measurements indicate a homogeneous flow only for a short period from February until April. At this time of the year preferential flow is insignificant, because the soil is at approximately field capacity and not repellent to water. During summer (May to September) the soil dries out, and most precipitation results in preferential flow during this period. For any daily rainfall exceeding 10 mm, water infiltrates down to 1 m depth in the soil, which nevertheless, is still within the root zone. This kind of deep percolation results in the subsoil's wetting to field capacity (pF 1.8) earlier than the topsoil. A one-dimensional numerical model (SWAP) was used to simulate mean water balance with hydraulic functions with and without a water-repellency term. From the results of our tracer experiment we showed that the de-watering process in spring could be simulated well using the traditional piston flow concept, while the rewetting behaviour could be described more realistically using the mobile-immobile concept for water repellency.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 23
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Preferential flow in water repellent sandy soils: principles and modeling implications [J].
Ritsema, CJ ;
Dekker, LW .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 231 :308-319
[22]   TDR calibration of organic forest floor media [J].
Schaap, MG ;
deLange, L ;
Heimovaara, TJ .
SOIL TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (02) :205-217
[23]   Seasonal dynamics of preferential flow in a water repellent soil [J].
Täumer, K ;
Stoffregen, H ;
Wessolek, G .
VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2006, 5 (01) :405-411
[24]  
van Dam J. C., 1997, 71 WAG AGR U DEP WAT
[25]   A CLOSED-FORM EQUATION FOR PREDICTING THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF UNSATURATED SOILS [J].
VANGENUCHTEN, MT .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1980, 44 (05) :892-898
[26]   A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR EVALUATING THE PRESENCE OF PREFERENTIAL FLOW PATHS IN NONSTRUCTURED SOILS [J].
VANOMMEN, HC ;
DEKKER, LW ;
DIJKSMA, R ;
HULSHOF, J ;
VANDERMOLEN, WH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (04) :1192-1193
[27]   Prediction of fingering in porous media [J].
Wang, Z ;
Feyen, J ;
Elrick, DE .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1998, 34 (09) :2183-2190
[28]  
Wessolek G, 2000, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V163, P13, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2624(200002)163:1<13::AID-JPLN13>3.3.CO
[29]  
2-V
[30]   MODELING WATER EROSION AND THE IMPACT OF WATER REPELLENCY [J].
WITTER, JV ;
JUNGERIUS, PD ;
TENHARKEL, MJ .
CATENA, 1991, 18 (02) :115-124