Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management

被引:273
作者
Baiyere, Abayomi [1 ,2 ]
Salmela, Hannu [2 ]
Tapanainen, Tommi [3 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Digitalizat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Turku, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Turku, Finland
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Global Studies, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Digital Transformation; business Process Management; organisational change; mindfulness; infrastructural flexibility; light touch process; IT-enabled organisational transformation; logics; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION; ORGANIZING LOGIC; DOMINANT LOGIC; INNOVATION; ROUTINES; ASSIMILATION; MINDFULNESS; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Business process management (BPM) research emphasises three important logics - modelling (process), infrastructural alignment (infrastructure) and procedural actor (agency) logics. These logics capture the dominant ways of thinking in BPM, reflected in its assumptions, practices and values. While the three logics have proven useful in prior contexts, we argue that the applicability of these underlying assumptions in theorising BPM needs to be re-examined in the context of digital transformation. Based on an ethnographic study of BPM in a company undergoing digital transformation, we uncover tensions related to applying these prior logics that point to the need to update the underlying assumptions. Consequently, we propose new logics that we conceptualise as light touch processes (process), infrastructural flexibility (infrastructure) and mindful actors (agency). Our observations contribute to a rethinking of the dominant BPM logics by unpacking their dynamics in the context of digital transformation. Our study further highlight salient differences between digital transformation and IT-enabled organisational transformation contexts. We conclude by proposing new managerial approaches for BPM in digital transformation contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 259
页数:22
相关论文
共 95 条
[71]  
SIDOROVA A, 2014, HDB BUSINESS PROCESS, V1, P333
[72]  
Silva L, 2007, MIS QUART, V31, P327
[73]  
Singh A, 2017, MIS Q EXEC, V16, P1
[74]  
Strauss A. L., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
[75]   From the editors: What grounded theory is not [J].
Suddaby, Roy .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 49 (04) :633-642
[76]   EMBRACING DIGITAL INNOVATION IN INCUMBENT FIRMS: HOW VOLVO CARS MANAGED COMPETING CONCERNS [J].
Svahn, Fredrik ;
Mathiassen, Lars ;
Lindgren, Rikard .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2017, 41 (01) :239-253
[77]   The choice of sourcing mechanisms for business processes [J].
Tanriverdi, Hueseyin ;
Konana, Prabhudev ;
Ge, Ling .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (03) :280-299
[78]  
Thornton P.H., 2008, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, V840, P99, DOI [10.4135/9781849200387.n4, DOI 10.4135/9781849200387.N4, 10.1086/210361, DOI 10.1086/210361]
[79]   The critical success factors of business process management [J].
Trkman, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (02) :125-134
[80]   Identity metamorphoses in digital disruption: a relational theory of identity [J].
Utesheva, Anastasia ;
Simpson, Jason R. ;
Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 25 (04) :344-363