Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management

被引:273
作者
Baiyere, Abayomi [1 ,2 ]
Salmela, Hannu [2 ]
Tapanainen, Tommi [3 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Digitalizat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Turku, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Turku, Finland
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Global Studies, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Digital Transformation; business Process Management; organisational change; mindfulness; infrastructural flexibility; light touch process; IT-enabled organisational transformation; logics; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION; ORGANIZING LOGIC; DOMINANT LOGIC; INNOVATION; ROUTINES; ASSIMILATION; MINDFULNESS; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Business process management (BPM) research emphasises three important logics - modelling (process), infrastructural alignment (infrastructure) and procedural actor (agency) logics. These logics capture the dominant ways of thinking in BPM, reflected in its assumptions, practices and values. While the three logics have proven useful in prior contexts, we argue that the applicability of these underlying assumptions in theorising BPM needs to be re-examined in the context of digital transformation. Based on an ethnographic study of BPM in a company undergoing digital transformation, we uncover tensions related to applying these prior logics that point to the need to update the underlying assumptions. Consequently, we propose new logics that we conceptualise as light touch processes (process), infrastructural flexibility (infrastructure) and mindful actors (agency). Our observations contribute to a rethinking of the dominant BPM logics by unpacking their dynamics in the context of digital transformation. Our study further highlight salient differences between digital transformation and IT-enabled organisational transformation contexts. We conclude by proposing new managerial approaches for BPM in digital transformation contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 259
页数:22
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
BAIYERE A, 2020, P 53 HAW INT C SYST
[2]   Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards [J].
Bala, Hillol ;
Venkatesh, Viswanath .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (03) :340-362
[3]   Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study [J].
Bandara, W ;
Gable, GG ;
Rosemann, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 14 (04) :347-360
[4]   Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA's Enterprise Information System [J].
Berente, Nicholas ;
Lyytinen, Kalle ;
Yoo, Youngjin ;
King, John Leslie .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (03) :551-572
[5]   Institutional Contradictions and Loose Coupling: Postimplementation of NASA's Enterprise Information System [J].
Berente, Nicholas ;
Yoo, Youngjin .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (02) :376-396
[6]   Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions [J].
Besson, Patrick ;
Rowel, Frantz .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 21 (02) :103-124
[7]   Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines [J].
Beverungen, Daniel .
BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2014, 6 (04) :191-202
[8]   VISIONS AND VOICES ON EMERGING CHALLENGES IN DIGITAL BUSINESS STRATEGY [J].
Bharadwaj, Anandhi ;
El Sawy, Omar A. ;
Pavlou, Paul A. ;
Venkatraman, N. .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2013, 37 (02) :633-634
[9]  
Bossert O, 2016, INTEL SYST REF LIBR, V111, P139, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40564-3_8
[10]   The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign [J].
Broadbent, M ;
Weill, P ;
St Clair, D .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1999, 23 (02) :159-182