Individual differences in working memory capacity predict benefits to memory from intention offloading

被引:19
作者
Ball, Hunter [1 ]
Peper, Phil [1 ]
Alakbarova, Durna [1 ]
Brewer, Gene [2 ]
Gilbert, Sam J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Psychol, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[3] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London, England
关键词
Prospective memory; offloading; reminders; working memory; individual differences; DELAYED INTENTIONS; COMPENSATORY ROLE; AGE-DIFFERENCES; TERM-MEMORY; TASK; ATTENTION; REMINDERS; METACOGNITION; PERFORMANCE; AVOIDANCE;
D O I
10.1080/09658211.2021.1991380
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research suggests that individuals with lower working memory have difficulty remembering to fulfil delayed intentions. The current study examined whether the ability to offload intentions onto the environment mitigated these deficits. Participants (N = 268) completed three versions of a delayed intention task with and without the use of reminders, along with three measures of working memory capacity. Results showed that individuals with higher working memory fulfilled more intentions when having to rely on their own memory, but this difference was eliminated when offloading was permitted. Individuals with lower working memory chose to offload more often, suggesting that they were less willing to engage in effortful maintenance of internal representations when given the option. Working memory was not associated with metacognitive confidence or optimal offloading choices based on point value. These findings suggest offloading may help circumvent capacity limitations associated with maintaining and remembering delayed intentions.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 91
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Hierarchical Multinomial Modeling Approaches An Application to Prospective Memory and Working Memory [J].
Arnold, Nina R. ;
Bayen, Ute J. ;
Smith, Rebekah E. .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 62 (03) :143-152
[2]  
Ball, 2021, DIFFERENTIAL BENEFIT, DOI [https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6rms2, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/6RMS2]
[3]   Individual differences in episodic memory abilities predict successful prospective memory output monitoring [J].
Ball, B. Hunter ;
Pitaes, Margarida ;
Brewer, Gene A. .
MEMORY, 2018, 26 (08) :1159-1168
[4]   Proactive Control Processes in Event-Based Prospective Memory: Evidence From Intraindividual Variability and Ex-Gaussian Analyses [J].
Ball, B. Hunter ;
Brewer, Gene A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2018, 44 (05) :793-811
[5]   Individual differences in the delayed execution of prospective memories [J].
Ball, B. Hunter ;
Knight, Justin B. ;
Dewitt, Michael R. ;
Brewer, Gene A. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (12) :2411-2425
[6]  
Ball H., 2019, Prospective memory, P116, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781351000154-8
[7]   Confidence guides spontaneous cognitive offloading [J].
Boldt, Annika ;
Gilbert, Sam J. .
COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2019, 4 (01)
[8]  
Brandimonte M.A., 2001, Psicologica: Revista de metodologia y psicologia experimental, V22, P97, DOI DOI 10.5334/pb-52-2-3-205
[9]   Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection [J].
Brewer, Gene A. ;
Knight, Justin B. ;
Marsh, Richard L. ;
Unsworth, Nash .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (03) :304-311
[10]   The Development of Memory Efficiency and Value-Directed Remembering Across the Life Span: A Cross-Sectional Study of Memory and Selectivity [J].
Castel, Alan D. ;
Humphreys, Kathryn L. ;
Lee, Steve S. ;
Galvan, Adriana ;
Balota, David A. ;
McCabe, David P. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (06) :1553-1564