Imaging methods to evaluate tumor microenvironment factors affecting nanoparticle drug delivery and antitumor response

被引:14
作者
Moody, Amber S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Dayton, Paul A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zamboni, William C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] UNC Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Carolina Inst Nanomed, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ North Carolina & North Carolina State Univ, Joint Dept Biomed Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Tumor microenvironment; imaging; drug delivery; nanoparticles; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; SATURATION-TRANSFER CEST; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; MOLECULAR ACOUSTIC ANGIOGRAPHY; RESONANCE ENERGY-TRANSFER; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; CONTRAST-ENHANCED-MRI; ACTIVITY IN-VIVO; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES;
D O I
10.20517/cdr.2020.94
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Standard small molecule and nanoparticulate chemotherapies are used for cancer treatment; however, their effectiveness remains highly variable. One reason for this variable response is hypothesized to be due to nonspecific drug distribution and heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment, which affect tumor delivery of the agents. Nanoparticle drugs have many theoretical advantages, but due to variability in tumor microenvironment (TME) factors, the overall drug delivery to tumors and associated antitumor response are low. The nanotechnology field would greatly benefit from a thorough analysis of the TME factors that create these physiological barriers to tumor delivery and treatment in preclinical models and in patients. Thus, there is a need to develop methods that can be used to reveal the content of the TME, determine how these TME factors affect drug delivery, and modulate TME factors to increase the tumor delivery and efficacy of nanoparticles. In this review, we will discuss TME factors involved in drug delivery, and how biomedical imaging tools can be used to evaluate tumor barriers and predict drug delivery to tumors and antitumor response.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 413
页数:32
相关论文
共 389 条
[1]  
Abramovitch R, 1999, CANCER RES, V59, P5012
[2]   Iopamidol: Exploring the potential use of a well-established X-ray contrast agent for MRI [J].
Aime, S ;
Calabi, L ;
Biondi, L ;
De Miranda, M ;
Ghelli, S ;
Paleari, L ;
Rebaudengo, C ;
Terreno, E .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (04) :830-834
[3]  
Aime S, 2002, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V41, P4334, DOI 10.1002/1521-3773(20021115)41:22<4334::AID-ANIE4334>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-1
[5]   Brain tumor acidification using drugs simultaneously targeting multiple pH regulatory mechanisms [J].
Albatany, Mohammed ;
Ostapchenko, Valeriy G. ;
Meakin, Susan ;
Bartha, Robert .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 144 (03) :453-462
[6]   In vivo detection of acute intracellular acidification in glioblastoma multiforme following a single dose of cariporide [J].
Albatany, Mohammed ;
Li, Alex ;
Meakin, Susan ;
Bartha, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (05) :812-819
[7]   Dichloroacetate induced intracellular acidification in glioblastoma: in vivo detection using AACID-CEST MRI at 9.4 Tesla [J].
Albatany, Mohammed ;
Li, Alex ;
Meakin, Susan ;
Bartha, Robert .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 136 (02) :255-262
[8]  
Allen AB, 2014, TISSUE ENG PART C-ME, V20, P806, DOI [10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0587, 10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0587]
[9]   Design of radiolabeled gelatinase inhibitor peptide (99mTc-CLP) and evaluation in rats [J].
Altiparmak, Burcu ;
Lambrecht, Fatma Yurt ;
Citak, Asli .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2014, 89 :130-133
[10]   Imaging tumor acidosis: a survey of the available techniques for mapping in vivo tumor pH [J].
Anemone, Annasofia ;
Consolino, Lorena ;
Arena, Francesca ;
Capozza, Martina ;
Longo, Dario Livio .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2019, 38 (1-2) :25-49