Evaluation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma patients by fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction:: the prognostic impact of achieving molecular response

被引:43
作者
Martinez-Sanchez, Pilar [1 ]
Montejano, Laura [1 ]
Sarasquete, Maria Eugenia [2 ]
Garcia-Sanz, Ramon [2 ]
Fernandez-Redondo, Elena [1 ]
Ayala, Rosa [1 ]
Montalban, Maria Angeles [1 ]
Martinez, Rafael
Larana, Jose Garcia [3 ]
Alegre, Adrian [4 ]
Hernandez, Belen [5 ]
Lahuerta, Juan Jose [1 ]
Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Serv Hematol, Madrid 28041, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Univ Salamanca, Serv Hematol, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Serv Hematol, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Princesa, Serv Hematol, Madrid, Spain
[5] Gen Hosp, Serv Hematol, Ciudad Real, Spain
关键词
multiple myeloma; fluorescent-PCR; IgH; flow cytometry; minimal residual disease;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07263.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study aimed to standardize a simple molecular method for evaluating the response to treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) patients after high dose chemotherapy. Fifty three patients enrolled in the GEM2000 protocol were studied for minimal residual disease (MRD) using both fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (F-PCR) and flow cytometry. Most patients had achieved complete remission or very good response after autologous stem cell transplantation. The molecular analysis of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements at diagnosis and during the follow-up was carried out by F-PCR according to the Biomed-2 protocols. F-PCR could be used in 91% of the patients and the results were similar to flow cytometry. F-PCR was able to identify a group of patients with a better prognosis [progression-free survival (PFS) 67.86% in patients with negative F-PCR vs. 28%; P = 0.001], even amongst patients who achieved a complete response with negative immunofixation (PFS 75% vs. 25%; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified the F-PCR result as the only variable to show a prognostic value when PFS was analysed. F-PCR of DHJ and light chain rearrangements of immunoglobulin genes is a feasible method for evaluating MRD in MM patients after intensive therapy. Achieving molecular response by F-PCR shows prognostic value.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 774
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   High-sensitive immunophenotyping and DNA ploidy studies for the investigation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma [J].
Almeida, J ;
Orfao, A ;
Ocqueteau, M ;
Mateo, G ;
Corral, M ;
Caballero, MD ;
Blade, J ;
Moro, MJ ;
Hernandez, J ;
San Miguel, JF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1999, 107 (01) :121-131
[2]   ORDERED REARRANGEMENT OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN HEAVY-CHAIN VARIABLE REGION SEGMENTS [J].
ALT, FW ;
YANCOPOULOS, GD ;
BLACKWELL, TK ;
WOOD, C ;
THOMAS, E ;
BOSS, M ;
COFFMAN, R ;
ROSENBERG, N ;
TONEGAWA, S ;
BALTIMORE, D .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1984, 3 (06) :1209-1219
[3]   Post-transplantation tumour load in bone marrow, as assessed by quantitative ASO-PCR, is a prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma [J].
Bakkus, MHC ;
Bouko, Y ;
Samson, D ;
Apperley, JF ;
Thielemans, K ;
Camp, BV ;
Benner, A ;
Goldschmidt, H ;
Moos, M ;
Cremer, FW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2004, 126 (05) :665-674
[4]   Stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in the era of novel drugs [J].
Bensinger, William .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) :480-492
[5]  
BILLADEAU D, 1992, BLOOD, V80, P1818
[6]  
Blade Joan, 1998, British Journal of Haematology, V102, P1115, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00930.x
[7]   Improved assessment of minimal residual disease in B cell malignancies using fluorogenic consensus probes for real-time quantitative PCR [J].
Brüggemann, M ;
Droese, J ;
Bolz, I ;
Lüth, P ;
Pott, C ;
von Neuhoff, N ;
Scheuering, U ;
Kneba, M .
LEUKEMIA, 2000, 14 (08) :1419-1425
[8]   Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma [J].
Davies, FE ;
Rawstron, RC ;
Owen, RG ;
Morgan, GJ .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) :197-222
[9]   The impact of attaining a minimal disease state after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma [J].
Davies, FE ;
Forsyth, PD ;
Rawstron, AC ;
Owen, RG ;
Pratt, G ;
Evans, PAS ;
Richards, SJ ;
Drayson, M ;
Smith, GM ;
Selby, PJ ;
Child, JA ;
Morgan, GJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :814-819
[10]   International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma [J].
Durie, B. G. M. ;
Harousseau, J-L ;
Miguel, J. S. ;
Blade, J. ;
Barlogie, B. ;
Anderson, K. ;
Gertz, M. ;
Dimopoulos, M. ;
Westin, J. ;
Sonneveld, P. ;
Ludwig, H. ;
Gahrton, G. ;
Beksac, M. ;
Crowley, J. ;
Belch, A. ;
Boccadaro, M. ;
Turesson, I. ;
Joshua, D. ;
Vesole, D. ;
Kyle, R. ;
Alexanian, R. ;
Tricot, G. ;
Attal, M. ;
Merlini, G. ;
Powles, R. ;
Richardson, P. ;
Shimizu, K. ;
Tosi, P. ;
Morgan, G. ;
Rajkumar, S. V. .
LEUKEMIA, 2006, 20 (09) :1467-1473