Economic implications of method of delivery

被引:79
作者
Allen, VM
O'Connell, CM
Farrell, SA
Baskett, TF
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Perinatal Epidemiol Res Unit, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
关键词
method of delivery; costs; economic implications;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.635
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study was undertaken to examine the costs of hospital care associated with different methods of delivery. Study design: An 18-year population-based cohort study (1985-2002) using the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database compared outcomes in nulliparous women at term undergoing spontaneous or induced labor for planned vaginal delivery, or undergoing cesarean delivery without labor. Costs that were assessed included physician fees, nursing hours in the labor and delivery, postpartum and neonatal intensive care units, epidural use, induction of labor agents, and consumables. Results: A total of 27,614 pregnancies satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria; 5233 of which had labor induced. A comparison of mean costs per mother/infant pair demonstrated that cesarean delivery in labor ($2137) was increased compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery ($1340, P =.01), assisted vaginal delivery ($1594, P =.01), and cesarean delivery without labor ($1532, P =.01). The cost of delivery after induction of labor ($1715) was increased compared with spontaneous onset of labor ($1474, P <.001). Conclusion: Cesarean delivery in labor occurs more frequently with labor induction and is associated with increased costs compared with other methods of delivery. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 197
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term [J].
Allen, VM ;
O'Connell, CM ;
Liston, RM ;
Baskett, TF .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (03) :477-482
[2]   The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysis [J].
Ananth, CV ;
Smulian, JC ;
Vintzileos, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (05) :1071-1078
[3]   Cesarean delivery on demand: What will it cost? [J].
Bost, BW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) :1418-1421
[4]   Cost-effectiveness of elective cesarean delivery in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women [J].
Chen, KT ;
Sell, RL ;
Tuomala, RE .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02) :161-168
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean [J].
Chung, A ;
Macario, A ;
El-Sayed, YY ;
Riley, ET ;
Duncan, B ;
Druzin, ML .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (06) :932-941
[6]   HOW DOES THE MODE OF DELIVERY AFFECT THE COST OF MATERNITY CARE [J].
CLARK, L ;
MUGFORD, M ;
PATERSON, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (06) :519-523
[7]   Is vaginal birth after cesarean less expensive than repeat cesarean delivery? [J].
Clark, SL ;
Scott, JR ;
Porter, TF ;
Schlappy, DA ;
McClellan, V ;
Burton, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (03) :599-602
[8]   Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: An historic cohort cost analysis [J].
DiMaio, H ;
Edwards, RK ;
Euliano, TY ;
Treloar, RW ;
Cruz, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) :890-892
[9]  
FAIR M, 1999, VALIDATION STUDY REC
[10]   Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas [J].
Farrell, SA ;
Allen, VM ;
Baskett, TF .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (03) :350-356