Techno-Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Production via Gasification of Vacuum Residue Integrated with Dry Methane Reforming

被引:3
作者
Al-Rowaili, Fayez Nasir [1 ,2 ]
Khalafalla, Siddig S. [1 ]
Jamal, Aqil [2 ]
Al-Yami, Dhaffer S. [2 ]
Zahid, Umer [1 ,3 ]
Al-Mutairi, Eid M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saudi Aramco, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals KFUPM, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Membranes & Water Secur, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Refining & Adv Chem, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
hydrogen; carbon dioxide capturing units; gasification process description; dry methane reforming; WATER;
D O I
10.3390/su132413588
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The continuous rise of global carbon emissions demands the utilization of fossil fuels in a sustainable way. Owing to various forms of emissions, our environment conditions might be affected, necessitating more focus of scientists and researchers to upgrade oil processing to more efficient manner. Gasification is a potential technology that can convert fossil fuels to produce clean and environmentally friendly hydrogen fuel in an economical manner. Therefore, this study analyzed and examined it critically. In this study, two different routes for the produc-tion of high-purity hydrogen from vacuum residue while minimizing the carbon emissions were proposed. The first route (Case I) studied the gasification of heavy vacuum residue (VR) in series with dry methane reforming (DMR). The second route studied the gasification of VR in parallel integration with DMR (Case II). After investigating both processes, a brief comparison was made between the two routes of hydrogen production in terms of their CO2 emissions, en-ergy efficiency, energy consumption, and environmental and economic impacts. In this study, the two vacuum-residue-to-hydrogen (VRTH) processes were simulated using Aspen Plus for a hydrogen production capacity of 50 t/h with 99.9 wt.% purity. The results showed that Case II offered a process energy efficiency of 57.8%, which was slightly higher than that of Case I. The unit cost of the hydrogen product for Case II was USD 15.95 per metric ton of hydrogen, which was almost 9% lower than that of Case I. In terms of the environmental analysis, both cases had comparably low carbon emissions of around 8.3 kg of CO2/kg of hydrogen produced; with such high purity, the hydrogen could be used for production of other products further downstream or for industrial applications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Co-Production of Hydrogen and Methanol Using Fuel Mix Systems: Technical and Economic Assessment [J].
Ahmed, Usama ;
Zahid, Umer ;
Onaizi, Sagheer A. ;
Jameel, Abdul Gani Abdul ;
Ahmad, Nauman ;
Ahmad, Nabeel ;
AlMohamadi, Hamad .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (14)
[2]   Production of hydrogen by methane dry reforming: A study on the effect of cerium and lanthanum on Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst performance [J].
Akiki, E. ;
Akiki, D. ;
Italiano, C. ;
Vita, A. ;
Abbas-Ghaleb, R. ;
Chlala, D. ;
Ferrante, G. Drago ;
Lagana, M. ;
Pino, L. ;
Specchia, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (41) :21392-21408
[3]   Techno-economic evaluation of methanol production via gasification of vacuum residue and conventional reforming routes [J].
Al-Rowaili, Fayez Nasir ;
Khalafalla, Siddig S. ;
Al-Yami, Dhaffer S. ;
Jamal, Aqil ;
Ahmed, Usama ;
Zahid, Umer ;
Al-Mutairi, Eid M. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 177 :365-375
[4]   A Mini-Review on Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production by Thermo-Catalytic and Bioconversion of Biomass and Its Environmental Implications [J].
Ayodele, Bamidele Victor ;
Mustapa, Siti Indati ;
Abdullah, Tuan Ab Rashid Bin Tuan ;
Salleh, Siti Fatihah .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 7
[5]  
Dominko M., 2010, GORIVA MAZ, V49, P78
[6]   A review of recent advances in water-gas shift catalysis for hydrogen production [J].
Ebrahimi, Parisa ;
Kumar, Anand ;
Khraisheh, Majeda .
EMERGENT MATERIALS, 2020, 3 (06) :881-917
[7]   Investigation of a novel & integrated simulation model for hydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass [J].
Ersoz, A. ;
DurakCetin, Y. ;
Sarioglan, A. ;
Turan, A. Z. ;
Mert, M. S. ;
Yuksel, F. ;
Figen, H. E. ;
Guldal, N. O. ;
Karaismailoglu, M. ;
Baykara, S. Z. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (02) :1081-1093
[8]  
IEA, 2019, The future of hydrogen: Seizing today's opportunities
[9]   Comparative assessment of renewable energy-based hydrogen production methods [J].
Ishaq, H. ;
Dincer, I. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135
[10]   CO2 green technologies in CO2 capture and direct utilization processes: methanation, reverse water-gas shift, and dry reforming of methane [J].
Jo, Seong Bin ;
Woo, Jin Hyeok ;
Lee, Jong Heon ;
Kim, Tae Young ;
Kang, Hu In ;
Lee, Soo Chool ;
Kim, Jae Chang .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2020, 4 (11) :5543-5549