An improved genetic algorithm optimization fuzzy controller applied to the wellhead back pressure control system

被引:146
作者
Liang, Haibo [1 ]
Zou, Jialing [1 ]
Zuo, Kai [2 ]
Khan, Muhammad Junaid [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
[2] China Natl Offshore Oil Corp, Tianjin 300000, Peoples R China
关键词
Wellhead back pressure; Fuzzy PID; Genetic algorithm; A throttle valve; PID CONTROLLER; RISK ANALYSIS; OIL; OPERATIONS; LEAKAGE; FIELDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106708
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The throttle valve is the core equipment to managed pressure drilling (MPD) technology. PID controller is the most widely used throttle valve control algorithm. However, in the wellhead back pressure control system, the control of the throttle valve has strong nonlinearity and time variability. This makes precise closed-loop control of wellhead back pressure a challenge. The traditional controller needs to be improved in terms of control speed, stability and robustness. To overcome these shortcomings, this paper proposes an improved genetic algorithm optimization fuzzy controller. Firstly the wellhead back pressure control model is established and transfer function is calculated. Secondly, an improved genetic algorithm to optimize the highly nonlinear fuzzy control rules between the input and response in the fuzzy PID controller is designed. Finally, four traditional controllers are compared with the developed model to prove the method is optimal. The proposed controller has excellent performance in terms of time response parameters (such as rise time, adjustment time, overshoot, and steady-state error). The controller exhibits great advantages in terms of speed, stability, and robustness, which significantly improves the performance of the wellhead back pressure control system. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using Bayesian network
    Abimbola, Majeed
    Khan, Faisal
    Khakzad, Nima
    Butt, Stephen
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 76 : 133 - 144
  • [2] Gas Phase Train in Upstream Oil & Gas Fields: PART-III Control System Design
    Al-Naumani, Y. H.
    Rossiter, J. A.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 13735 - 13740
  • [3] Algina TB, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 XX IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND MEASUREMENTS (SCM), P785, DOI 10.1109/SCM.2017.7970724
  • [4] Anfinsen H, 2017, INT C CONTR AUTOMAT, P963, DOI 10.23919/ICCAS.2017.8204363
  • [5] Development of mature oil fields - A review
    Babadagli, Tayfun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 57 (3-4) : 221 - 246
  • [6] Breyholtz O., 2010, SPE128151MS
  • [7] Evaluation of control methods for drilling operations with unexpected gas influx
    Carlsen, Liv A.
    Nygaard, Gerhard
    Nikolaou, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2013, 23 (03) : 306 - 316
  • [8] Chen CH, 2013, 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS (IFUZZY 2013), P488, DOI 10.1109/iFuzzy.2013.6825466
  • [9] Chong Xie, 2011, 2011 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), P5722
  • [10] Moth-Flame Optimization-Based Fuzzy-PID Controller for Optimal Control of Active Magnetic Bearing System
    Dhyani, Abhishek
    Panda, Manoj Kumar
    Jha, Bhola
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 42 (04) : 451 - 463