Effect of conditioning electrical stimuli on temporalis electromyographic activity during sleep

被引:70
作者
Jadidi, F. [1 ]
Castrillon, E. [1 ]
Svensson, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Clin Oral Physiol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Sensory Motor Ineract, Orofacial Pain Lab, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
bruxism; electromyography; electrical; stimulation; biofeedback; signal recognition algorithm; sleep disorder;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01781.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Inhibitory reflexes during voluntary contractions are well described; however, few studies have attempted to use such reflex-mechanisms to modulate electromyographic (EMG) activity in jaw-closing muscles during sleep. The aim was to apply a new intelligent biofeedback device (Grindcare (R)) using electrical pulses to inhibit EMG activity in the temporalis muscle during sleep. Fourteen volunteers participated who were aware of jaw-clenching activity as indicated by complaints from sleep partner, soreness or pain in the jaw-muscle upon awakening and tooth wear facets. The EMG activity was recorded from the temporalis muscle, online analysed and the frequency content determined using a signal recognition algorithm. Based on specific individual parameters for pattern recognition, an electrical square-wave pulse train, which was adjusted to a clear, but non-painful intensity (range 1-7 mA) was applied through the EMG electrodes, if jaw-clenching activity was detected. All volunteers had baseline EMG recordings for five to seven consecutive nights, followed by 3-weeks EMG recordings with the feedback turned on, 2 weeks without the feedback and finally 3 weeks with the biofeedback on. There were no session effects on the average duration of sleep hours (P = 0.626). The number of EMG episodes/hour sleep was significantly reduced during the two sessions with biofeedback (54 +/- 14%; 55 +/- 17%, P < 0.001) compared with baseline EMG activity and the session without biofeedback. The present study suggests that biofeedback with electrical pulses does not cause major disruption in sleep and is associated with pronounced reduction in temporalis EMG activity during sleep.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 183
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]  
Rugh J D, 1988, Adv Neurol, V49, P329
[32]  
RUGH J D, 1989, Journal of Craniomandibular Disorders, V3, P203
[33]  
RUGH JD, 1975, CALIF DENT ASSOC J, V3, P56
[34]  
Slade G D, 1994, Community Dent Health, V11, P3
[35]  
THOMPSON BA, 1994, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V49, P1617
[36]  
van der Zaag J, 2005, J OROFAC PAIN, V19, P151
[37]   Heterogeneity of temporomandibular disorders: cluster and case-control analyses [J].
Velly, AM ;
Philippe, P ;
Gornitsky, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (10) :969-979
[38]   A comparison of the muscular relaxation effect of TENS and EMG-biofeedback in patients, with bruxism [J].
Wieselmann-Penkner, K ;
Janda, M ;
Lorenzoni, M ;
Polansky, R .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 28 (09) :849-853