Comparison of different gas turbine cycles and advanced exergy analysis of the most effective

被引：69

作者：

Fallah, M. ^{[1
]}

Siyahi, H. ^{[1
]}

Ghiasi, R. Akbarpour ^{[1
]}

Mahmoudi, S. M. S. ^{[1
]}

Yari, M. ^{[1
]}

Rosen, M. A. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Tabriz, Dept Mech Engn, Bldg 8,29 Bahman Ave, Tabriz, Iran

[2] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada

来源：

ENERGY | 2016年 / 116卷

关键词：

Steam injection gas turbine; Air cooling; Evaporative cooling technique; Exergy; Advanced exergy analysis; ADVANCED EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HEAT-PUMP GEHP; TRIGENERATION SYSTEM; POWER-PLANT; DESTRUCTION; RECOVERY; OPTIMIZATION; INTEGRATION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.009

中图分类号：

O414.1 [热力学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Four gas turbine systems are compared: simple gas turbine (SGT), gas turbine with evaporative inlet air cooler (EVGT), steam injection gas turbine (STIG) and steam injection gas turbine with evaporative inlet air cooler (ESTIG). These comparisons are done on the basis of conventional exergy analysis and the results show that the ESTIG cycle is the most advantageous for the designer. After determining the ESTIG optimum conditions from maximum net work and maximum second law efficiency perspectives using conventional exergy analysis, advanced exergy analysis is performed for this system at its optimum conditions to provide detailed information about the improvement potential of the system components. The analysis is carried out on the basis of the engineering method and the thermodynamic cycle method is used to validate the endogenous exergy destruction rates of the system components. The results show that the optimization priority order for the system components is different when determined with advanced exergy analysis compared to conventional exergy analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：701 / 715

页数：15

共 37 条

[1] Advanced exergoeconomic analysis of a trigeneration system using a diesel-gas engine [J].

Acikkalp, Emin ;

Aras, Haydar ;

Hepbasli, Arif .

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 67 (1-2) :388-395

[2] Advanced exergoeconomic analysis of an electricity-generating facility that operates with natural gas [J].

Acikkalp, Emin ;

Aras, Haydar ;

Hepbasli, Arif .

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 :452-460

[3] Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine cycle with fogging inlet cooling [J].

Athari, Hassan ;

Soltani, Saeed ;

Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed ;

Rosen, Marc A. ;

Morosuk, Tatiana .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2015, 18 (01) :104-127

[4] Comparative exergoeconomic analyses of the integration of biomass gasification and a gas turbine power plant with and without fogging inlet cooling [J].

Athari, Hassan ;

Soltani, Saeed ;

Bolukbasi, Abdurrahim ;

Rosen, Marc A. ;

Morosuk, Tatiana .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 76 :394-400

[5]

Bartolini CM, 1997, INT GAS TURB AER C E

[6] Gas turbine evaporative cooling evaluation for Lagos - Nigeria [J].

Carmona, Jose .

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 89 :262-269

[7]

Cheng D.Y., 2002, P VOLUME 2 ASME TURB, P421

[8] Technological and economical analysis of water recovery in steam injected gas turbines [J].

De Paepe, M ;

Dick, E .

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 21 (02) :135-156

[9] Advanced exergy analysis of the Kalina cycle applied for low temperature enhanced geothermal system [J].

Fallah, M. ;

Mohammad, S. ;

Mahmoudi, S. ;

Yari, M. ;

Ghiasi, R. Akbarpour .

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 108 :190-201

[10] Effect of various inlet air cooling methods on gas turbine performance [J].

Farzaneh-Gord, Mahmood ;

Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mandi .

ENERGY, 2011, 36 (02) :1196-1205

← 1 2 3 4 →