History and the Philosophy of Art

被引：2

作者：

Carroll, Noel ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] CUNY, New York, NY 10021 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY | 2011年 / 5卷 / 03期

关键词：

history; aesthetics; philosophy of art; formalism; representation; expression; Bell; Weitz; Danto; Wollheim; Levinson; Stecker; narrativism; form of life; Neo-Wittgensteinians;

D O I：

10.1163/187226311X599862

中图分类号：

K [历史、地理];

学科分类号：

06 ;

摘要：

In this essay I trace the role of history in the philosophy of art from the early twentieth century to the present, beginning with the rejection of history by formalists like Clive Bell. I then attempt to show how the arguments of people like Morris Weitz and Arthur Danto led to a re-appreciation of history by philosophers of art such as Richard Wollheim, Jerrold Levinson, Robert Stecker and others.

引用

页码：370 / 382

页数：13

共 10 条

[1]

Bell C., 1914, Art. Chatto Et Windus

[2]

Carroll Noel, 1993, J AESTHETICS ART CRI, V52, P313

[3]

Collingwood R.G, 1938, PRINCIPLES ART

[4]

Danto Arthur, 2011, SUBVERSIVE STRATEGIE, P359

[5]

Danto Arthur, 1995, PHILOS ART READINGS, P209

[6] DEFINING ART HISTORICALLY [J].

LEVINSON, J .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS, 1979, 19 (03) :232-250

[7]

Mandelbaum Maurice, 1995, PHILOS ART, P193

[8]

STECKER R, 1997, ARTWORKS

[9]

Weitz M., 1956, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, V15, P27, DOI DOI 10.2307/427491

[10]

Wollheim Richard., 1980, ART ITS OBJECTS, V2nd

← 1 →