Friendships after severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of current speech pathology practice

被引:2
作者
Bertram, Tennille [1 ]
Power, Emma [1 ]
Douglas, Jacinta [2 ]
Togher, Leanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Speech Pathol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Human Serv & Sport, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; friends; cognitive-communication; ICF; survey; COMMUNICATION PARTNERS; PEOPLE; IMPACT; CONVERSATIONS; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1080/02699052.2020.1764100
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate current speech pathology practice regarding working with friends. Method An online survey was conducted with 68 speech pathologists who worked with TBI across metropolitan and rural settings in Australia. The survey investigated the reasons speech pathologists work with friends, barriers to working with friends and perceptions of successful friendships post TBI. Descriptive statistics and content analysis of open ended responses were used to analyze the data. Results There were more speech pathologists (40%) who did not include friends compared to those who did. Friends were most commonly included in the rehabilitation process, through the provision of education programs. The primary rationale for working with friends was to prevent negative psychosocial outcomes for the person with TBI. There were numerous barriers to working with friends, most commonly the inability to access friends. Conclusions Making and keeping friends are a significant part of most people's lives. Therefore, it is important to consider their role in contributing to improved outcomes for people with TBI. With communication partner training being an integral component to recovery and maintenance of relationships post TBI, the development of targeted education and training materials is warranted, to enable the inclusion of friends in the rehabilitation process.
引用
收藏
页码:1020 / 1030
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ICF INT CLASFUNCT
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIN APHASIOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_23
[3]  
[Anonymous], SURVEY RES RELIABILI, DOI DOI 10.3109/02699051003610441
[4]   Barriers that prevent implementation of research findings in nursing: Education-research hospitals case [J].
Ay, Fatma ;
Genctuerk, Nuran ;
Miral, Mukaddes Turan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (06) :646-654
[5]   Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends [J].
Bogart, Elise ;
Togher, Leanne ;
Power, Emma ;
Docking, Kimberley .
BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (03) :221-233
[6]   Exploring speech-language pathologists' perspectives about living successfully with aphasia [J].
Brown, Kyla ;
Worrall, Linda ;
Davidson, Bronwyn ;
Howe, Tami .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2011, 46 (03) :300-311
[7]   Improving post-stroke recovery: the role of the multidisciplinary health care team [J].
Clarke, David J. ;
Forster, Anne .
JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2015, 8 :433-442
[8]   Analysis of language and communication function in traumatic brain injured patients [J].
Cools, C ;
Manders, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 1998, 21 (03) :323-329
[9]  
Creswell J.W., 2014, Fourth Edition. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative
[10]   Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships [J].
Davidson, Bronwyn ;
Howe, Tami ;
Worrall, Linda ;
Hickson, Louise ;
Togher, Leanne .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (04) :325-340