Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Identifying Risk Factors and Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Samuel, Ankhita R. [1 ]
Stranix, John T. [1 ]
DeGeorge, Brent R., Jr. [1 ]
Black, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Campbell, Chris A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Plast Surg, Box 800376, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; mastectomy; angiography; alloplastic; autologous; SKIN FLAP NECROSIS; INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PREDICT; VIABILITY; DYE;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003215
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) has been described as a useful adjunct to physical examination in predicting mastectomy skin flap viability for immediate breast reconstruction. Its use has been described as a screening tool for mastectomy skin flap viability as well as a test used only for patients at high risk for mastectomy skin flap loss. We performed a national database review of implant-based breast reconstruction surgeries to determine the practice patterns of FA in this patient cohort and to determine if this technology impacted clinical outcomes. Methods A national insurance claims database was reviewed to select patients having undergone direct-to-implant (DTI) and immediate tissue expander (TE) placement with and without intraoperative FA as well as patients who had FA at the time of mastectomy without reconstruction. Patient characteristics that prompted FA and postoperative outcomes with and without FA were evaluated to determine its clinical impact in the observed practice pattern. Results Of the 48,464 patients identified, 836 had FA. More than twice as many patients undergoing DTI had FA than patients undergoing immediate TE placement (10.4% vs 5%, P < 0.0001). Twelve percent of patients receiving FA at the time of mastectomy had reconstruction delayed. Fluorescence angiography was associated with a trend toward lower overall complication rates in DTI patients (8.0% vs 11.9% without FA) but a significantly higher overall complication rate with immediate TE placement (13.8% vs 10.5% without FA, P = 0.018) and was associated with higher reoperation (12.0% vs 8.3% without FA, P = 0.037) in the TE group. There was no difference in other individual complications, readmission, or explantation for either clinical group with and without FA. Regression analysis identified obesity (odds ratio, 1.32; P < 0.001) and younger age (odds ratio, 1.74; P < 0.001) to be associated with performing FA, whereas obesity, diabetes, and tobacco use were associated with higher complication rates. Conclusions Younger and otherwise healthier obese patients were more likely to have FA. A greater proportion of DTI patients had FA than TE patients with improved outcomes in the former group and worse outcomes in the latter group. Obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes were associated with worse outcomes, whereas only obesity was associated with FA use.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Outcome Analysis of Intraoperative Angiography for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Duggal, Claire S.
    Madni, Tarik
    Losken, Albert
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2014, 34 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [32] Desmoid Tumor and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Kilmartin, Catherine
    Westover, Clinton
    Raghavan, Shyam
    Dillon, Patrick M.
    Campbell, Chris A.
    CASE REPORTS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 16 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [33] Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using TiLoop Bra Mesh Combined With Pectoralis Major Disconnection
    Chen, Guanglei
    Zhang, Yixiao
    Xue, Jinqi
    Zhu, Xudong
    Liu, Chao
    Sun, Lisha
    Gu, Xi
    Zhang, Hao
    Liu, Caigang
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 83 (04) : 396 - 400
  • [34] The Impact of Aeroform Tissue Expanders on the Outcomes of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Awadeen, Abdelrahman
    Fareed, Mohamed
    Elameen, Ali Mohamed
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (01) : 130 - 143
  • [35] Modern Approaches to Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 50 (02) : 223 - 234
  • [37] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction A Meta-analysis
    Li, Yunzhu
    Xu, Gang
    Yu, Nanze
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (04) : 437 - 447
  • [38] A controlled cost and outcomes analysis of acellular dermal matrix and implant-based reconstruction
    Aliotta, Rachel E.
    Duraes, Eliana F. R.
    Scomacao, Isis
    Morisada, Megan
    Orra, Susan
    Moreira, Andrea
    Bernard, Steven
    Schwarz, Graham
    Djohan, Risal
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (06): : 1229 - 1238
  • [39] A Multimetric Health Literacy Analysis of Autologous Versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Chen, Daniel H.
    Johnson, Anna Rose
    Ayyala, Haripriya
    Lee, Edward S.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Tran, Bao Ngoc N.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 : S102 - S108
  • [40] Immediate Postmastectomy Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Outpatient Procedure?
    Keane, Alexandra M.
    Keane, Grace C.
    Skolnick, Gary B.
    Chi, David
    Ebersole, Trina D.
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (01) : 1E - 11E