Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk

被引:26
作者
Brinthaupt, Thomas M. [1 ]
Benson, Scott A. [1 ]
Kang, Minsoo [2 ]
Moore, Zaver D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Psychol, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA
[2] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Hlth & Human Performance, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA
关键词
Self-Talk Scale; self-reports; inner experience; personality assessment; individual differences; PERSONALITY PATHOLOGY; PRIVATE SPEECH; FREQUENCY; KNOWLEDGE; VALIDITY; BEHAVIOR; VARIABILITY; SPEAKING; ANXIETY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
As with most kinds of inner experience, it is difficult to assess actual self-talk frequency beyond self-reports, given the often hidden and subjective nature of the phenomenon. The Self-Talk Scale (STS; Brinthaupt et al., 2009) is a self-report measure of self-talk frequency that has been shown to possess acceptable reliability and validity. However, no research using the STS has examined the accuracy of respondents self-reports. In the present paper, we report a series of studies directly examining the measurement of self-talk frequency and functions using the STS. The studies examine ways to validate self-reported self-talk by (1) comparing STS responses from 6 weeks earlier to recent experiences that might precipitate self-talk, (2) using experience sampling methods to determine whether STS scores are related to recent reports of self-talk over a period of a week, and (3) comparing self-reported STS scores to those provided by a significant other who rated the target on the STS. Results showed that (1) overall self-talk scores, particularly self-critical and self-reinforcing self-talk, were significantly related to reports of context-specific self-talk; (2) high STS scorers reported talking to themselves significantly more often during recent events compared to low STS scorers, and, contrary to expectations, (3) friends reported less agreement than strangers in their self-other self-talk ratings. Implications of the results for the validity of the STS and for measuring self-talk are presented.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Validity and reliability of the experiencesampling method, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8, 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Cognitive therapy of depression
[3]  
Back M.D., 2012, Handbook of self-knowledge, P131
[4]   Predicting Actual Behavior From the Explicit and Implicit Self-Concept of Personality [J].
Back, Mitja D. ;
Schmukle, Stefan C. ;
Egloff, Boris .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 97 (03) :533-548
[5]   Many-Faceted Rasch Calibration An Example Using the Self-Talk Scale [J].
Brinthaupt, Thomas M. ;
Kang, Minsoo .
ASSESSMENT, 2014, 21 (02) :241-249
[6]   Differences in self-talk frequency as a function of age, only-child, and imaginary childhood companion status [J].
Brinthaupt, Thomas M. ;
Dove, Christian T. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2012, 46 (03) :326-333
[7]   The Self-Talk Scale: Development, Factor Analysis, and Validation [J].
Brinthaupt, Thomas M. ;
Hein, Michael B. ;
Kramer, Tracey E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2009, 91 (01) :82-92
[8]  
Brinthaupt TM., 1992, SELF DEFINITIONAL ME, P137, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PAID.2018.03.037
[9]   Self-Other Knowledge Asymmetries in Personality Pathology [J].
Carlson, Erika N. ;
Vazire, Simine ;
Oltmanns, Thomas F. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2013, 81 (02) :155-170
[10]  
Carver C.S., 2008, On the self-regulation of behavior, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174794, 10.1017/CBO9781139174794]