Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases: Use of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Monitor and Predict Radiolabeled Octreotide Therapy Response

被引:36
|
作者
Miyazaki, Keiko [1 ,6 ]
Orton, Matthew R. [1 ,6 ]
Davidson, Robert L. [1 ,6 ]
d'Arcy, James A. [1 ,6 ]
Lewington, Valerie [2 ]
Koh, Tong San [3 ]
Thng, Choon Hua [4 ]
Leach, Martin O. [1 ,6 ]
Collins, David J. [1 ,6 ]
Koh, Dow-Mu [5 ]
机构
[1] Canc Res UK, Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept Nucl Med, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol Imaging, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London SW3 6JJ, England
[6] EPSRC Canc Imaging Ctr, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
关键词
DCE-MRI; CLINICAL-TRIAL; INPUT FUNCTION; PERFUSION; CANCER; INHIBITOR; PHOSPHATE; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.12110770
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for monitoring and assessing treatment response in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases treated using yttrium 90 (Y-90)-labeled octreotide (Y-90-DOTATOC). Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the local research and ethics committee and patient informed consent was obtained. Twenty patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors underwent T1-weighted DCE MR imaging of the liver before and at 2 months after intravenous Y-90-DOT-ATOC treatment. Regions of interest were drawn around target lesions, as well as along liver outlines for each patient. A dual-input single-compartment model was used to compute parameters including fractional distribution volume and the arterial flow fraction. Pre- and posttreatment values were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Treatment response was defined as showing a greater than 50% reduction in the nadir chromogranin A level within the 1st year after treatment. Pretreatment values of responders and nonresponders were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A two-tailed P value of .008 or less, which accounts for multiple testing, was considered to indicate a significant difference. Results: In responders, tumor and whole liver distribution volume significantly increased after treatment (median tumor distribution volume, 0.182 vs 0.244; median whole liver distribution volume, 0.175 vs 0.207; P = .008). The pretreatment whole liver distribution volume was significantly lower in responders (median, 0.175 vs 0.248; P = .003), while pretreatment tumor arterial flow fraction was significantly higher in responders (median, 1.000 vs 0.761, P = .006). Conclusion: DCE MR imaging may be used to monitor the effects of peptide receptor radiolabeled targeted therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors liver metastases; a lower pretreatment distribution volume and high arterial flow fraction was associated with a better response to treatment. (C) RSNA, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Liu, Chunling
    Wang, Kun
    Chan, Queenie
    Liu, Zaiyi
    Zhang, Jine
    He, Hui
    Zhang, Shuixing
    Liang, Changhong
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (11) : 3888 - 3898
  • [22] SEMIQUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING MEASUREMENTS PREDICT RADIATION RESPONSE IN CERVIX CANCER
    Zahra, Mark A.
    Tan, Li Tee
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Graves, Martin J.
    Arends, Mark
    Crawford, Robin A. F.
    Brenton, James D.
    Lomas, David J.
    Sala, Evis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 766 - 773
  • [23] Variability induced by the MR imager in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the prostate
    Brunelle, S.
    Zemmour, C.
    Bratan, F.
    Mege-Lechevallier, F.
    Ruffion, A.
    Colombel, M.
    Crouzet, S.
    Sarran, A.
    Rouviere, O.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2018, 99 (04) : 255 - 264
  • [24] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Techniques and Clinical Applications
    Gaddikeri, S.
    Gaddikeri, R. S.
    Tailor, T.
    Anzai, Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (04) : 588 - 595
  • [25] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma
    De Coninck, T.
    Jans, L.
    Sys, G.
    Huysse, W.
    Verstraeten, T.
    Forsyth, R.
    Poffyn, B.
    Verstraete, K.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (11) : 3140 - 3152
  • [26] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma
    T. De Coninck
    L. Jans
    G. Sys
    W. Huysse
    T. Verstraeten
    R. Forsyth
    B. Poffyn
    K. Verstraete
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 3140 - 3152
  • [27] Modified MR dispersion imaging in prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Sung, Kyunghyun
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (04) : 1307 - 1317
  • [28] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion imaging of head and neck tumors at 3 Tesla
    Furukawa, Matakazu
    Parvathaneni, Upendra
    Maravilla, Kenneth
    Richards, Todd L.
    Anzai, Yoshimi
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (07): : 923 - 929
  • [29] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound after devascularisation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: functional and morphological evaluation
    Guibal, Aymeric
    Lefort, Thibaud
    Chardon, Laurence
    Benslama, Noura
    Mule, Sebastien
    Pilleul, Franck
    Lombard-Bohas, Catherine
    Bridal, Lori
    Chayvialle, Jean Alain
    Lucidarme, Olivier
    Denys, Alban
    Walter, Thomas
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (03) : 805 - 815
  • [30] Characterizing Hypervascular and Hypovascular Metastases and Normal Bone Marrow of the Spine Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging
    Khadem, N. R.
    Karimi, S.
    Peck, K. K.
    Yamada, Y.
    Lis, E.
    Lyo, J.
    Bilsky, M.
    Vargas, H. A.
    Holodny, A. I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (11) : 2178 - 2185