AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY INTERPRETATIONS OF AGENCY RULES

[1] CROSS FB, 1998, ADMIN LAW REV, V107, P2155

[2] Cross Frank B., 1998, YALE LAW J, V107, P2171

[3] Eskridge William N., 2008, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V96, P1142

[4] Eskridge WN, 2008, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V96, P1083

[5] Constitutional structure and judicial deference to agency interpretations of agency rules [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1996, 96 (03) : 612 - 696

[6] Miles TJ, 2008, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V75, P761

[7] Miles TJ, 2006, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V73, P823

[8] Miles Thomas J., 2008, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V75, P788

[9] Pierce RJ, 2011, ADMIN LAW REV, V63, P77

[10] 150 CASES PER YEAR - SOME IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURTS LIMITED RESOURCES FOR JUDICIAL-REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1987, 87 (06) : 1093 - 1136

[1] CROSS FB, 1998, ADMIN LAW REV, V107, P2155

[2] Cross Frank B., 1998, YALE LAW J, V107, P2171

[3] Eskridge William N., 2008, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V96, P1142

[4] Eskridge WN, 2008, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V96, P1083

[5] Constitutional structure and judicial deference to agency interpretations of agency rules [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1996, 96 (03) : 612 - 696

[6] Miles TJ, 2008, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V75, P761

[7] Miles TJ, 2006, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V73, P823

[8] Miles Thomas J., 2008, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V75, P788

[9] Pierce RJ, 2011, ADMIN LAW REV, V63, P77

[10] 150 CASES PER YEAR - SOME IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURTS LIMITED RESOURCES FOR JUDICIAL-REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1987, 87 (06) : 1093 - 1136