Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study

被引:19
|
作者
Adamo, V.
Lorusso, V.
Rossello, R.
Adamo, B.
Ferraro, G.
Lorusso, D.
Condemi, G.
Priolo, D.
Di Lullo, L.
Paglia, A.
Pisconti, S.
Scambia, G.
Ferrandina, G.
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Campobasso, Dept Oncol, Gynecol Oncol Unit, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp G Martino, Dept Human Pathol, Messina, Italy
[3] Hosp Fazzi, Lecce, Italy
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Rome, Italy
[5] Hosp Siderno, Siderno, Italy
[6] Hosp San Vincenzo, Taormina, Italy
[7] ASL2, Isemia, Italy
[8] Toronto Hosp, Oncol Unit, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
metastatic breast cancer; pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; gemcitabine;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604409
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This multicentre phase II study was aimed at investigating the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) as front-line therapy in a large series of chemotherapy-naive recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients. From June 2003 to December 2006, a total of 71 recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range 37-79), and 31 patients (43.7%) were >= 65 years old. Patients received PLD, 25 mg m(-2), day 1, followed by GEM, 800 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, q21. Response was evaluable in 64 cases. Eight complete (12.5%) and 17 partial responses (26.6%) were registered, with an overall response rate of 39.1%. Thirty patients (46.9%) experienced stable disease, with an overall clinical benefit of 85.9%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The rate of 1- and 2-year OS was 79 and 61%, respectively. A total of 443 courses were evaluable for toxicity: grade 3 and 4 neutropaenia affected 14 patients (20.3%) and 3 patients (4.3%), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was documented in five cases (7.2%) and one case (1.4%), whereas grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurred in six cases (8.7%) and two cases (2.9%), respectively. Grade 2 cardiac toxicity was observed in only one case. Interestingly enough, there was no difference in the percentage and severity of either haematological or non-haematological toxicity according to the age of the patients (< 65 vs >= 65 years). We confirmed in a large, very homogenous study sample of chemotherapy-naive recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients the efficacy and safety of PLD/GEM combination, providing response rates, median TTP and OS values comparable with those achieved with more toxic combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:1916 / 1921
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A phase II study of combination chemotherapy in early relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer using gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
    Mirza, Mansoor Raza
    Lund, Bente
    Lindegaard, Jacob Christian
    Keldsen, Nina
    Mellemgaard, Anders
    Christensen, Rene dePont
    Bertelsen, Kamma
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 119 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [22] First-line therapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel in locally, recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: A phase II study
    Djelila Allouache
    Sulochana R Gawande
    Michele Tubiana-Hulin
    Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu
    Sophie Piperno-Neumann
    Fawzia Mefti
    Laurence Bozec
    Jean-Yves Genot
    BMC Cancer, 5
  • [23] A multicentric observational trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for metastatic breast cancer
    Jens Huober
    Werner Fett
    Arnd Nusch
    Michael Neise
    Marcus Schmidt
    Arthur Wischnik
    Steffen Gerhardt
    Thomas Goehler
    Hans-Joachim Lück
    Andreas Rost
    BMC Cancer, 10
  • [24] Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study
    Michela Donadio
    Mara Ardine
    Alfredo Berruti
    Giuliana Ritorto
    Elena Fea
    Marinella Mistrangelo
    Zaira Coccorullo
    Paola Bergnolo
    Alessandro Comandone
    Oscar Bertetto
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2003, 52 : 147 - 152
  • [25] Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study
    Donadio, M
    Ardine, M
    Berruti, A
    Ritorto, G
    Fea, E
    Mistrangelo, M
    Coccorullo, Z
    Bergnolo, P
    Comandone, A
    Bertetto, O
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 52 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [26] Docetaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients: results of the phase II GINECO trial CAPYTTOLE
    de la Fouchardiere, C.
    Largillier, R.
    Goubely, Y.
    Hardy-Bessard, A. -C.
    Slama, B.
    Cretin, J.
    Orfeuvre, H.
    Paraiso, D.
    Bachelot, T.
    Pujade-Lauraine, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (12) : 1959 - 1963
  • [27] Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Minisini, Alessandro M.
    Andreetta, Claudia
    Fasola, Gianpiero
    Puglisi, Fabio
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2008, 8 (03) : 331 - 342
  • [28] Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer: final results of a phase II trial
    Schmid, Peter
    Krocker, J.
    Kreienberg, R.
    Klare, P.
    Kittel, K.
    Sommer, H.
    Heinrich, G.
    Steck, T.
    Lichtenegger, W.
    Elling, D.
    Kuemmel, S.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 64 (02) : 401 - 406
  • [29] A randomised phase II study of two different schedules of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer (EORTC-10993)
    Coleman, RE
    Biganzoli, L
    Canney, P
    Dirix, L
    Mauriac, L
    Chollet, P
    Batter, V
    Ngalula-Kabanga, E
    Dittrich, C
    Piccart, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (07) : 882 - 887
  • [30] Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer: final results of a phase II trial
    Peter Schmid
    J. Krocker
    R. Kreienberg
    P. Klare
    K. Kittel
    H. Sommer
    G. Heinrich
    T. Steck
    W. Lichtenegger
    D. Elling
    S. Kümmel
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2009, 64 : 401 - 406