The Causes of Emigration from Singapore: How Much Is Still Political?

被引:8
作者
Fetzer, Joel S. [1 ]
Millan, Brandon Alexander [2 ]
机构
[1] Pepperdine Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Malibu, CA 90263 USA
[2] Santa Monica Coll, Dept Polit Sci, Santa Monica, CA 90405 USA
关键词
People's Action Party (PAP); E.G; Ravenstein; democratization; emigration; Singapore; Australia; Albert O. Hirschman; brain drain; LABOR-MARKET; MIGRATION; DEMOCRACY; CHINA;
D O I
10.1080/14672715.2015.1057029
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Efforts to maintain a robust Singaporean economy have had to confront the serious challenge of substantial brain drain from the city-state. To address the negative effects of this problem, Singapore's ruling People's Action Party (PAP) has adopted a policy of increasing reliance on a foreign labor force. Meanwhile, the PAP appears to ignore the continued loss of human and intellectual capital. This study examines the main determinants of emigration from Singapore, specifically the political factors. The analysis is based on two primary data surveys that investigated what Singaporeans think about emigration: the 2006 Asian Barometer and the 2000-2002 Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Australia. Contrary to some previous empirical literature, data from these surveys indicate that anti-PAP and pro-democratic ideas strongly influence the decision of native Singaporeans to leave the island state. These findings likewise suggest that democratization and an expansion of business and technical education would be more effective in preserving economic growth than a policy of importing labor in the face of popular xenophobia.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 476
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Who takes bribes and how much? Evidence from the China Corruption Conviction Databank
    Aidt, Toke S.
    Hillman, Arye L.
    Liu Qijun
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 133
  • [22] How much free sugar do Australians consume? Findings from a national survey
    Gupta, Adyya
    Smithers, Lisa G.
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette
    Harford, Jane
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 42 (06) : 533 - 540
  • [23] HOW IS POLITICAL PRIVACY DIFFERENT FROM PERSONAL PRIVACY? AN ARGUMENT FROM DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE
    Samonek, Aleksandra
    DIAMETROS, 2021, 18 (70): : 64 - 77
  • [24] How much e-waste is there in US basements and attics? Results from a national survey
    Saphores, Jean-Daniel M.
    Nixon, Hilary
    Ogunseitan, Oladele A.
    Shapiro, Andrew A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (11) : 3322 - 3331
  • [25] HOW MUCH DOES SOCIAL STATUS MATTER TO LONGEVITY?-EVIDENCE FROM CHINA'S ACADEMICIAN ELECTION
    Liu, Gordon G.
    Kwon, Ohyun
    Xue, Xindong
    Fleisher, Belton M.
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (03) : 292 - 304
  • [26] How are internally oriented HRM policies related to high-performance work practices? Evidence from Singapore
    Barnard, ME
    Rodgers, RA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 11 (06) : 1017 - 1046
  • [27] Vaccine-preventable child deaths in New South Wales from 2005 to 2014: How much is preventable?
    Phillips, Anastasia
    Beard, Frank
    Macartney, Kristine
    Chan, Jocelyn
    Gilmour, Robin
    Saravanos, Gemma
    McIntyre, Peter
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2018, 54 (04) : 356 - 364
  • [28] How does political trust affect social trust? An analysis of survey data from rural China using an instrumental variables approach
    Tao, Ran
    Yang, Dali L.
    Li, Ming
    Lu, Xi
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2014, 35 (02) : 237 - 253
  • [29] Who all access private coaching in higher education and how much do they spend? Evidence from India
    Choudhury, Pradeep Kumar
    Kumar, Amit
    Gill, Angrej Singh
    JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2023, 28 (04) : 1433 - 1455
  • [30] How globalisation influences perspectives on citizenship education: from the social and political to the cultural and moral
    Veugelers, Wiel
    COMPARE-A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, 2021, 51 (08) : 1174 - 1189