Ethical Issues in Genetic Testing for Inherited Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: the Potentially Conflicting Interests of Patients and Their Relatives

被引:3
作者
Kenny, Joanna [1 ,2 ]
Burcher, Stephanie [1 ]
Kohut, Kelly [1 ]
Eastman, Nigel [3 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Clin Genet, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, England
关键词
Cancer; Predictive genetic testing; Confidentiality; Duty of care; Ethics; FAMILY COMMUNICATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40142-020-00186-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose of ReviewThis review uses clinical cases to highlight some of the ethical dilemmas currently faced by oncologists, geneticists and others who request genetic testing for inherited cancer disorders.Recent FindingsRecent ethical guidance supports clinicians in testing patients when other family members decline similar testing, even when such testing will reveal those family members' genetic status. And increasingly there is acknowledgement that when a patient declines to share genetic results with family members, clinicians may have an ethical duty to breach patient confidentiality in order to inform at-risk relatives to whom they may owe a duty of care, so that they can choose to access genetic testing and potentially life-saving screening and treatment.SummaryGenetic testing for inherited cancer disorders raises multiple ethical issues, which cannot always be easily resolved by discussion with patients, or with their family members. Clinical ethics committees can provide valuable assistance in resolving the dilemmas presented in these cases.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 77
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CONF GOOD PRACT HAND
  • [2] Communicating genetic test results within the family: Is it lost in translation? A survey of relatives in the randomized six-step study
    Daly, Mary B.
    Montgomery, Susan
    Bingler, Ruth
    Ruth, Karen
    [J]. FAMILIAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (04) : 697 - 706
  • [3] Limitations and Pitfalls of Using Family Letters to Communicate Genetic Risk: a Qualitative Study with Patients and Healthcare Professionals
    Dheensa, Sandi
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Fenwick, Angela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (03) : 689 - 701
  • [4] An investigation of patients' motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
    Hallowell, N.
    Cooke, S.
    Crawford, G.
    Lucassen, A.
    Parker, M.
    Snowdon, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2010, 36 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [5] Heimler Audrey, 1995, J Genet Couns, V4, P125, DOI 10.1007/BF01408635
  • [6] Koehly LM, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P304
  • [7] Kromberg JGR, 2013, SAMJ S AFR MED J, V103, P1023, DOI [10.7196/SAMJ.7146, 10.7196/samj.7146]
  • [8] Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation
    Leenen, Celine H. M.
    den Heijer, Mariska
    van der Meer, Conny
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    Wagner, Anja
    [J]. FAMILIAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [9] Alerting relatives about heritable risks: the limits of confidentiality
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Gilbar, Roy
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 361 : k1409
  • [10] Medicine JCoGi, 2019, CONS CONF GEN MED RE