Increasing dose intensity of cisplatin-etoposide in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma -: A phase III randomized trial of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group

被引:0
|
作者
Font, A
Moyano, AJ
Puerto, JM
Tres, A
Garcia-Giron, C
Barneto, I
Anton, A
Sanchez, JJ
Salvador, A
Rosell, R
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Germans Trias & Pujol, Med Oncol Serv, Badalona 08916, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Med Oncol Serv, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Infanta Cristina, Med Oncol Serv, Badajoz, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin, Med Oncol Serv, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Hosp Gen Yague, Med Oncol Serv, Burgos, Spain
[6] Hosp Reina Sofia, Med Oncol Serv, Cordoba, Spain
[7] Hosp Miguel Servet, Med Oncol Serv, Zaragoza, Spain
[8] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Med, Dept Prevent Med, Madrid, Spain
[9] Novartis Farmaceut SA, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
cisplatin; dose density; dose intensity; etoposide; nonsmall cell lung carcinoma; randomized Phase III study;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990215)85:4<855::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-R
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors designed this randomized, controlled trial to assess whether dose intensification of a cisplatin-etoposide combination (PE), achieved by shortening the interval between chemotherapy cycles, would improve response rate and survival. The maximum tolerated dose of PE was administered in either 3- or 4-week cycles to patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS, One hundred twenty-three patients were randomized into two groups. The dose-intense arm received cisplatin 35 mg/m(2) and etoposide 200 mg/m(2) on Days 1-3 every 4 weeks. The dose-dense arm received the same schedule every 3 weeks along with 5 mu g/kg of recombinant human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) administered subcutaneously on Days 4-13. RESULTS. Patient characteristics were well balanced in both treatment arms. Fifty-four percent of patients were classified as Stage IIIB. A 32% increase in relative dose intensity was achieved in the dose-dense arm compared with the dose-intense arm. The response rates were 32% in the dose-intense arm and 27% in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.9). The median overall survival was higher in the dose-dense arm, 9 Versus 7.2 months (P = 0.2). The main toxicity was myelosuppression, although the administration of GM-CSF significantly reduced the percentage of patients with Grade 4 granulocytopenia (53% vs. 78%). Fifty-four percent of the patients in the dose-intense arm and 35% of those in the dose-dense arm developed febrile neutropenia (P = 0.07). There were ten (8%) treatment-related deaths, three (4%) in the dose-intense arm and seven (12%) in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.3); three deaths in each arm were due to febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS. The dose-intensification achieved in the dose-dense PE regimen did not correlate with significant improvements in response rate or survival and cannot be recommended in the light of the diversity of new drug combinations available today. However, the use of rhGM-CSF significantly reduced the incidence of severe granulocytopenia. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 863
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized phase II study of two opposite administration sequences of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
    Han, JY
    Lim, HS
    Lee, DH
    Ju, SY
    Lee, SY
    Kim, HY
    Park, YH
    Lee, JS
    CANCER, 2006, 106 (04) : 873 - 880
  • [22] Outcomes of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Cisplatin-Etoposide Versus Carboplatin-Etoposide
    Karam, Irene
    Jiang, Shi Yuan
    Khaira, Mandip
    Lee, Christopher W.
    Schellenberg, Devin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 38 (01): : 51 - 54
  • [23] A Phase II study of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin combination in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
    Kosmas, C
    Tsavaris, NB
    Polyzos, A
    Kalofonos, HP
    Sepsas, E
    Malamos, NA
    Vadiaka, M
    Dosios, T
    Antonopoulos, MJ
    CANCER, 2000, 89 (04) : 774 - 782
  • [24] Phase III Study Comparing Sequential Versus Alternate Administration of Cisplatin-Etoposide and Topotecan as First-line Treatment in Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Baka, Sophia
    Agelaki, Sophia
    Kotsakis, Athanasios
    Veslemes, Marinos
    Papakotoulas, Pavlos
    Agelidou, Maria
    Agelidou, Athina
    Tsaroucha, Emily
    Pavlakou, Georgia
    Gerogianni, Aleka
    Androulakis, Nikolaos
    Vamvakas, Lambros
    Kalbakis, Kostas
    Mavroudis, Dimitris
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (07) : 3031 - 3038
  • [25] PHASE-II STUDY OF PROLONGED ORAL ETOPOSIDE IN COMBINATION WITH INTRAVENOUS CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER
    MILLER, AA
    NIELL, HB
    GRIFFIN, JP
    LUNG CANCER, 1995, 12 (1-2) : 59 - 65
  • [26] Belotecan/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma: a multi-center randomized phase III trial
    Oh, In-Jae
    Kim, Kyu-Sik
    Park, Cheol-Kyu
    Kim, Young-Chul
    Lee, Kwan-Ho
    Jeong, Jin-Hong
    Kim, Sun-Young
    Lee, Jeong-Eun
    Shin, Kye-Chul
    Jang, Tae-Won
    Lee, Hyun-Kyung
    Lee, Kye-Young
    Lee, Sung-Yong
    BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [27] Cisplatin-etoposide alternating with topotecan in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) - A multicenter phase II study
    Mavroudis, D
    Veslemes, M
    Kouroussis, C
    Tzanakis, N
    Ferdoutsis, E
    Toumbis, M
    Ziotopoulos, P
    Agelidou, M
    Tselepatiotis, E
    Kalbakis, K
    Souglakos, J
    Magkanas, E
    Samonis, G
    Georgoulias, V
    LUNG CANCER, 2002, 38 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [28] A PHASE-I TRIAL OF IFOSFAMIDE, MESNA, AND CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - A CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP-B STUDY
    GRAZIANO, SL
    HERNDON, JE
    RICHARDS, F
    DIFINO, S
    MODEAS, C
    DUGGAN, DB
    GREEN, MR
    CANCER, 1993, 72 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [29] Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine, and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer
    Hasturk, Serap
    Hatabay, Nilgun
    Ece, Ferah
    Karatasli, Meltem
    Hanta, Ismail
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (03): : 280 - 285