Increasing dose intensity of cisplatin-etoposide in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma -: A phase III randomized trial of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group

被引:0
|
作者
Font, A
Moyano, AJ
Puerto, JM
Tres, A
Garcia-Giron, C
Barneto, I
Anton, A
Sanchez, JJ
Salvador, A
Rosell, R
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Germans Trias & Pujol, Med Oncol Serv, Badalona 08916, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Med Oncol Serv, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Infanta Cristina, Med Oncol Serv, Badajoz, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin, Med Oncol Serv, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Hosp Gen Yague, Med Oncol Serv, Burgos, Spain
[6] Hosp Reina Sofia, Med Oncol Serv, Cordoba, Spain
[7] Hosp Miguel Servet, Med Oncol Serv, Zaragoza, Spain
[8] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Med, Dept Prevent Med, Madrid, Spain
[9] Novartis Farmaceut SA, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
cisplatin; dose density; dose intensity; etoposide; nonsmall cell lung carcinoma; randomized Phase III study;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990215)85:4<855::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-R
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors designed this randomized, controlled trial to assess whether dose intensification of a cisplatin-etoposide combination (PE), achieved by shortening the interval between chemotherapy cycles, would improve response rate and survival. The maximum tolerated dose of PE was administered in either 3- or 4-week cycles to patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS, One hundred twenty-three patients were randomized into two groups. The dose-intense arm received cisplatin 35 mg/m(2) and etoposide 200 mg/m(2) on Days 1-3 every 4 weeks. The dose-dense arm received the same schedule every 3 weeks along with 5 mu g/kg of recombinant human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) administered subcutaneously on Days 4-13. RESULTS. Patient characteristics were well balanced in both treatment arms. Fifty-four percent of patients were classified as Stage IIIB. A 32% increase in relative dose intensity was achieved in the dose-dense arm compared with the dose-intense arm. The response rates were 32% in the dose-intense arm and 27% in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.9). The median overall survival was higher in the dose-dense arm, 9 Versus 7.2 months (P = 0.2). The main toxicity was myelosuppression, although the administration of GM-CSF significantly reduced the percentage of patients with Grade 4 granulocytopenia (53% vs. 78%). Fifty-four percent of the patients in the dose-intense arm and 35% of those in the dose-dense arm developed febrile neutropenia (P = 0.07). There were ten (8%) treatment-related deaths, three (4%) in the dose-intense arm and seven (12%) in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.3); three deaths in each arm were due to febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS. The dose-intensification achieved in the dose-dense PE regimen did not correlate with significant improvements in response rate or survival and cannot be recommended in the light of the diversity of new drug combinations available today. However, the use of rhGM-CSF significantly reduced the incidence of severe granulocytopenia. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 863
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized phase III trial comparing cisplatin-etoposide to carhoplatin-paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
    Belani, CP
    Lee, JS
    Socinski, MA
    Robert, F
    Waterhouse, D
    Rowland, K
    Ansari, R
    Lilenbaum, R
    Natale, RB
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) : 1069 - 1075
  • [2] High dose tamoxifen plus cisplatin and etoposide in the treatment of patients with advanced, inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
    Yang, CH
    Cheng, AL
    Yeh, KH
    Yu, CJ
    Lin, JF
    Yang, PC
    CANCER, 1999, 86 (03) : 415 - 420
  • [3] Concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, and radiotherapy for unresectable Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer: A Phase II study
    Reboul, F
    Brewer, Y
    Vincent, P
    Chauvet, B
    Faure, CF
    Taulelle, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (02): : 343 - 350
  • [4] A randomized phase II trial of echinomycin, trimetrexate, and cisplatin plus etoposide in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma - An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E1587)
    Chang, AY
    Kim, K
    Boucher, H
    Bonomi, P
    Stewart, JA
    Karp, DD
    Blum, RH
    CANCER, 1998, 82 (02) : 292 - 300
  • [5] Evaluation of cisplatin, carboplatin, and etoposide in metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma - A phase II study of the southwest oncology group
    Figlin, RA
    Crowley, JJ
    Jacobs, EL
    Muirhead, M
    Goodwin, JW
    Rinehart, JJ
    Livingston, RB
    CANCER, 1996, 78 (05) : 998 - 1003
  • [6] CISPLATIN, 5-FLUOROURACIL, AND ETOPOSIDE FOR ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER
    LYNCH, TJ
    KASS, F
    KALISH, LA
    ELIAS, AD
    STRAUSS, G
    SHULMAN, LN
    SUGARBAKER, DJ
    SKARIN, A
    FREI, E
    CANCER, 1993, 71 (10) : 2953 - 2957
  • [7] Economic evaluation in a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer
    Sacristán, JA
    Kennedy-Martin, T
    Rosell, R
    Cardenal, F
    Antón, A
    Lomas, M
    Alberola, V
    Massuti, B
    Carrato, A
    Minshall, M
    LUNG CANCER, 2000, 28 (02) : 97 - 107
  • [8] A multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide versus cisplatin-etoposide as first-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer
    Mavroudis, D
    Papadakis, E
    Veslemes, M
    Tsiafaki, X
    Stavrakakis, J
    Kouroussis, C
    Kakolyris, S
    Bania, E
    Jordanoglou, J
    Agelidou, M
    Vlachonicolis, J
    Georgoulias, V
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (04) : 463 - 470
  • [9] A phase I/II trial of etoposide and cisplatin in extensive small cell lung cancer: A cancer and leukemia group B study
    Mitchell, EP
    Perry, MC
    Luikart, SD
    Cirrincione, CT
    VanEcho, DA
    Herndon, JE
    Maurer, LH
    Clamon, G
    Green, MR
    LUNG CANCER, 1996, 15 (02) : 215 - 223
  • [10] Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin as first-line treatment for extensive small-cell lung cancer
    Yan Sun
    Ying Cheng
    Xuezhi Hao
    Jie Wang
    Chengping Hu
    Baohui Han
    Xiaoqing Liu
    Li Zhang
    Huiping Wan
    Zhongjun Xia
    Yunpeng Liu
    Wei Li
    Mei Hou
    Helong Zhang
    Qingyu Xiu
    Yunzhong Zhu
    Jifeng Feng
    Shukui Qin
    Xiaoyan Luo
    BMC Cancer, 16