Response to Early Generation Genomic Selection for Yield in Wheat

被引:14
作者
Bonnett, David [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yongle [3 ]
Crossa, Jose [1 ,4 ]
Dreisigacker, Susanne [1 ]
Basnet, Bhoja [1 ]
Perez-Rodriguez, Paulino [4 ]
Alvarado, G. [1 ]
Jannink, J. L. [5 ,6 ]
Poland, Jesse [7 ]
Sorrells, Mark [6 ]
机构
[1] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr, Texcoco, Mexico
[2] BASF Wheat Breeding, Sabin, MN 56580 USA
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Agr Food & Wine, Fac Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Colegio Postgrad, Texcoco, Mexico
[5] USDA ARS, Robert W Holley Ctr Agr & Hlth, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[6] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Plant Breeding & Genet Sect, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[7] Kansas State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
early generation genomic selection; linear and non-linear kernels genomic matrices; wheat breeding; breeding methodology; response to selection; ENABLED PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS; WIDE ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VALUES; BREEDING POPULATIONS; ASSISTED PREDICTION; REGRESSION-MODELS; PLANT; GENOTYPE; PEDIGREE;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2021.718611
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
We investigated increasing genetic gain for grain yield using early generation genomic selection (GS). A training set of 1,334 elite wheat breeding lines tested over three field seasons was used to generate Genomic Estimated Breeding Values (GEBVs) for grain yield under irrigated conditions applying markers and three different prediction methods: (1) Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP), (2) GBLUP with the imputation of missing genotypic data by Ridge Regression BLUP (rrGBLUP_imp), and (3) Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) a.k.a. Gaussian Kernel (GK). F2 GEBVs were generated for 1,924 individuals from 38 biparental cross populations between 21 parents selected from the training set. Results showed that F2 GEBVs from the different methods were not correlated. Experiment 1 consisted of selecting F2s with the highest average GEBVs and advancing them to form genomically selected bulks and make intercross populations aiming to combine favorable alleles for yield. F4:6 lines were derived from genomically selected bulks, intercrosses, and conventional breeding methods with similar numbers from each. Results of field-testing for Experiment 1 did not find any difference in yield with genomic compared to conventional selection. Experiment 2 compared the predictive ability of the different GEBV calculation methods in F2 using a set of single plant-derived F2:4 lines from randomly selected F2 plants. Grain yield results from Experiment 2 showed a significant positive correlation between observed yields of F2:4 lines and predicted yield GEBVs of F2 single plants from GK (the predictive ability of 0.248, P < 0.001) and GBLUP (0.195, P < 0.01) but no correlation with rrGBLUP_imp. Results demonstrate the potential for the application of GS in early generations of wheat breeding and the importance of using the appropriate statistical model for GEBV calculation, which may not be the same as the best model for inbreds.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spectral-genomic chain-model approach enhances the wheat yield component prediction under the Mediterranean climate
    Sadeh, Roy
    Ben-David, Roi
    Herrmann, Ittai
    Peleg, Zvi
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2024, 176 (04)
  • [42] Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement
    Desta, Zeratsion Abera
    Ortiz, Rodomiro
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 19 (09) : 592 - 601
  • [43] Genomic selection and genetic gain for nut yield in an Australian macadamia breeding population
    O'Connor, Katie M.
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Hardner, Craig M.
    Alam, Mobashwer
    Henry, Robert J.
    Topp, Bruce L.
    BMC GENOMICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [44] Genomic Selection of Forage Quality Traits in Winter Wheat
    Maulana, Frank
    Kim, Ki-Seung
    Anderson, Joshua D.
    Sorrells, Mark E.
    Butler, Twain J.
    Liu, Shuyu
    Baenziger, P. Stephen
    Byrne, Patrick F.
    Ma, Xue-Feng
    CROP SCIENCE, 2019, 59 (06) : 2473 - 2483
  • [45] Wheat quality improvement at CIMMYT and the use of genomic selection on it
    Guzman, Carlos
    Javier Pena, Roberto
    Singh, Ravi
    Autrique, Enrique
    Dreisigacker, Susanne
    Crossa, Jose
    Rutkoski, Jessica
    Poland, Jesse
    Battenfield, Sarah
    APPLIED AND TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS, 2016, 11 : 3 - 8
  • [46] Genomic selection can accelerate the biofortification of spring wheat
    Joukhadar, Reem
    Thistlethwaite, Rebecca
    Trethowan, Richard M.
    Hayden, Matthew J.
    Stangoulis, James
    Cu, Suong
    Daetwyler, Hans D.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2021, 134 (10) : 3339 - 3350
  • [47] Hyperspectral Reflectance-Derived Relationship Matrices for Genomic Prediction of Grain Yield in Wheat
    Krause, Margaret R.
    Gonzalez-Perez, Lorena
    Crossa, Jose
    Perez-Rodriguez, Paulino
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval
    Singh, Ravi P.
    Dreisigacker, Susanne
    Poland, Jesse
    Rutkoski, Jessica
    Sorrells, Mark
    Gore, Michael A.
    Mondal, Suchismita
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2019, 9 (04): : 1231 - 1247
  • [48] Cassava yield traits predicted by genomic selection methods
    Braatz de Andrade, Luciano Rogerio
    Bandeira e Sousa, Massaine
    Oliveira, Eder Jorge
    Vilela de Resende, Marcos Deon
    Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [49] Phenomic and genomic prediction of yield on multiple locations in winter wheat
    Jackson, Robert
    Buntjer, Jaap B.
    Bentley, Alison R.
    Lage, Jacob
    Byrne, Ed
    Burt, Chris
    Jack, Peter
    Berry, Simon
    Flatman, Edward
    Poupard, Bruno
    Smith, Stephen
    Hayes, Charlotte
    Barber, Tobias
    Love, Bethany
    Gaynor, R. Chris
    Gorjanc, Gregor
    Howell, Phil
    Mackay, Ian J.
    Hickey, John M.
    Ober, Eric S.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2023, 14
  • [50] Genomic Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield Using Machine Learning
    Sirsat, Manisha Sanjay
    Oblessuc, Paula Rodrigues
    Ramiro, Ricardo S.
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):