Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching

被引:9
作者
Cameron, Brendan D. [1 ]
Lopez-Moliner, Joan
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Psicol Basica, Vis & Control Act Grp, Barcelona 08035, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
Action; Online control; Reaching; Proprioception; Vision; SENSORY INTEGRATION; HAND ORIENTATION; FEEDBACK; MOVEMENTS; POSITION; ADJUSTMENTS; DIRECTION; VISION; MODEL; END;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The integration of vision and proprioception for estimating the hand's starting location prior to a reach has been shown to depend on the modality of the target towards which the reach is planned. Here we investigated whether the processing of online feedback is also influenced by target modality. Participants made reaching movements to a target that was defined by vision, proprioception, or both, and visual feedback about the unfolding movement was either present or absent. To measure online control we used the variability across trials; we examined the course of this variability for the different target modalities and effector conditions. Our results showed that the rate of decrease in variability in the later part of the movements (an indicator of online control) was minimally influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a proprioceptive target, whereas the rate of decrease was clearly influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a visual target. In other words, when participants reached towards a proprioceptively defined target they relied less on visual information about the moving hand than when they reached towards a visually defined target. These results suggest that target modality influences visual processing for online control. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 243
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Contribution of visual and proprioceptive information to the precision of reaching movements
    Monaco, Simona
    Kroliczak, Gregory
    Quinlan, Derek J.
    Fattori, Patrizia
    Galletti, Claudio
    Goodale, Melvyn A.
    Culham, Jody C.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 202 (01) : 15 - 32
  • [22] Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO
  • [23] 2
  • [24] PRABLANC C, 1986, EXP BRAIN RES, V62, P293
  • [25] OPTIMAL RESPONSE OF EYE AND HAND MOTOR SYSTEMS IN POINTING AT A VISUAL TARGET .2. STATIC AND DYNAMIC VISUAL CUES IN THE CONTROL OF HAND MOVEMENT
    PRABLANC, C
    ECHALLIER, JE
    JEANNEROD, M
    KOMILIS, E
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1979, 35 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [26] AUTOMATIC-CONTROL DURING HAND REACHING AT UNDETECTED 2-DIMENSIONAL TARGET DISPLACEMENTS
    PRABLANC, C
    MARTIN, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 67 (02) : 455 - 469
  • [27] Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements
    Sarlegna, F
    Blouin, J
    Vercher, JL
    Bresciani, JP
    Bourdin, C
    Gauthier, GM
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 157 (04) : 468 - 471
  • [28] The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance
    Sarlegna, Fabrice R.
    Sainburg, Robert L.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 176 (02) : 267 - 280
  • [29] Internally driven control of reaching movements: A study on a proprioceptively deafferented subject
    Sarlegna, FR
    Gauthier, GM
    Bourdin, C
    Vercher, JL
    Blouin, J
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2006, 69 (04) : 404 - 415
  • [30] Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements
    Saunders, JA
    Knill, DC
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 162 (04) : 458 - 473