Predicting shear failure in reinforced concrete members using a three-dimensional peridynamic framework

被引:27
作者
Hobbs, Mark [1 ]
Hattori, Gabriel [1 ]
Orr, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国科学技术设施理事会;
关键词
Bond-based peridynamics; Reinforced concrete; Shear failure; Model validation; Three-dimensional fracture propagation; TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT; CRACK-PROPAGATION; MESHFREE METHOD; STRENGTH; FRACTURE; HORIZON; BEAMS; MODEL; BEHAVIOR; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106682
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The assumptions made in design codes can result in unconservative predictions of shear strength for reinforced concrete members. The limitations of empirical methods have prompted the development and use of numerical techniques. A three-dimensional bond-based peridynamic framework is developed for predicting shear failure in reinforced concrete members. The predictive accuracy and generality of the framework is assessed against existing experimental results. Nine reinforced concrete beams that exhibit a wide range of failure modes are modelled. The shear-span-to-depth ratio is systematically varied from 1 to 8 to facilitate a study of different load-transfer mechanisms and failure modes. A comprehensive validation study such as this has until now been missing in the peridynamic literature. A bilinear constitutive law is employed, and the sensitivity of the model is tested using two levels of mesh refinement. The predictive error between the experimental and numerical failure loads ranges from +3% to-57%, highlighting the importance of validation against a series of problems. The results demonstrate that the model captures many of the factors that contribute to shear and bending resistance. New insights into the capabilities and deficiencies of the peridynamic model are gained by comparing the expected load-transfer mechanisms with the predictive error. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
*ABAQUS, 2006, ABAQUS EXPL US MAN V
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, REINFORCED PRESTRESS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HDB PERIDYNAMIC MODE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 1992112004A12014 BS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010
[6]   Round-robin analysis of the RILEM TC 162-TDF beam-bending test:: Part 2 -: Approximation of δ from the CMOD response [J].
Barr, BIG ;
Lee, MK ;
Hansen, EJD ;
Dupont, D ;
Erdem, E ;
Schaerlaekens, S ;
Schnütgen, B ;
Stang, H ;
Vandewalle, L .
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2003, 36 (263) :621-630
[7]   SIZE EFFECT IN FRACTURE OF CERAMICS AND ITS USE TO DETERMINE FRACTURE ENERGY AND EFFECTIVE PROCESS ZONE LENGTH [J].
BAZANT, ZP ;
KAZEMI, MT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1990, 73 (07) :1841-1853
[8]   Concrete fracture models: testing and practice [J].
Bazant, ZP .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2002, 69 (02) :165-205
[9]  
Bentz EC, 2006, ACI STRUCT J, V103, P614
[10]   The Meaning, Selection, and Use of the Peridynamic Horizon and its Relation to Crack Branching in Brittle Materials [J].
Bobaru, Florin ;
Hu, Wenke .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2012, 176 (02) :215-222