Bio-energy conversion performance, biodegradability, and kinetic analysis of different fruit residues during discontinuous anaerobic digestion

被引:70
作者
Zhao, Chen [1 ]
Yan, Hu [1 ]
Liu, Yan [2 ]
Huang, Yan [1 ]
Zhang, Ruihong [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Chang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Guangqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Coll Chem Engn, Biomass Energy & Environm Engn Res Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Coll Life Sci & Technol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Fruit residues; Batch anaerobic digestion; Substrate characteristics; Methane production performance; Multiple linear regression model; Kinetics; CO-DIGESTION; METHANE PRODUCTION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; CHICKEN MANURE; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Huge amounts of fruit residues are produced and abandoned annually. The high moisture and organic contents of these residues makes them a big problem to the environment. Conversely, they are a potential resource to the world. Anaerobic digestion is a good way to utilize these organic wastes. In this study, the biomethane conversion performances of a large number of fruit residues were determined and compared using batch anaerobic digestion, a reliable and easily accessible method. The results showed that some fruit residues containing high contents of lipids and carbohydrates, such as loquat peels and rambutan seeds, were well fit for anaerobic digestion. Contrarily, residues with high lignin content were strongly recommended not to be used as a single substrate for methane production. Multiple linear regression model was adopted to simulate the correlation between the organic component of these fruit residues and their experimental methane yield, through which the experimental methane yield could probably be predicted for any other fruit residues. Four kinetic models were used to predict the batch anaerobic digestion process of different fruit residues. It was shown that the modified Gompertz and Cone models were better fit for the fruit residues compared to the first-order and Fitzhugh models. The first findings of this study could provide useful reference and guidance for future studies regarding the applications and potential utilization of fruit residues. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 301
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Batstone D., 2015, REV ENVIRON SCI BIO, P1
[2]   Exponential model describing methane production kinetics in batch anaerobic digestion: a tool for evaluation of biochemical methane potential assays [J].
Brule, Mathieu ;
Oechsner, Hans ;
Jungbluth, Thomas .
BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2014, 37 (09) :1759-1770
[3]   Anaerobic digestion of bio-waste: A mini-review focusing on territorial and environmental aspects [J].
Cecchi, Franco ;
Cavinato, Cristina .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2015, 33 (05) :429-438
[4]   Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review [J].
Chen, Ye ;
Cheng, Jay J. ;
Creamer, Kurt S. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (10) :4044-4064
[5]   Kinetics of methane production from the codigestion of switchgrass and Spirulina platensis algae [J].
El-Mashad, Hamed M. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 132 :305-312
[6]   Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste [J].
El-Mashad, Hamed M. ;
Zhang, Ruihong .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (11) :4021-4028
[7]   Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and fruit wastes: Evaluation of the transitory states when the co-substrate is changed [J].
Fonoll, X. ;
Astals, S. ;
Dosta, J. ;
Mata-Alvarez, J. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2015, 262 :1268-1274
[8]   Anaerobic digestion and co-digestion processes of vegetable and fruit residues: Process and microbial ecology [J].
Garcia-Pena, E. I. ;
Parameswaran, P. ;
Kang, D. W. ;
Canul-Chan, M. ;
Krajmalnik-Brown, R. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (20) :9447-9455
[9]  
Gavala HN, 2003, ADV BIOCHEM ENG BIOT, V81, P57
[10]   Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks [J].
Gunaseelan, VN .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2004, 26 (04) :389-399