Requirements and Design of the PROSPER Protocol for Implementation of Information Infrastructures Supporting Pandemic Response: A Nominal Group Study

被引:20
作者
Timpka, Toomas [1 ,2 ]
Eriksson, Henrik [2 ]
Gursky, Elin A. [3 ]
Stromgren, Magnus [4 ]
Holm, Einar [4 ]
Ekberg, Joakim [1 ,2 ]
Eriksson, Olle [2 ]
Grimvall, Anders [2 ]
Valter, Lars [1 ]
Nyce, James M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] ANSER Analyt Serv Inc, Natl Strategies Support Directorate, Arlington, VA USA
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Social & Econ Geog, Umea, Sweden
[5] Ball State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
PUBLIC-HEALTH; INFECTIOUS-DISEASE; INFLUENZA; SURVEILLANCE; SYSTEMS; EVOLUTION; QUALITY; CARE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0017941
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Advanced technical systems and analytic methods promise to provide policy makers with information to help them recognize the consequences of alternative courses of action during pandemics. Evaluations still show that response programs are insufficiently supported by information systems. This paper sets out to derive a protocol for implementation of integrated information infrastructures supporting regional and local pandemic response programs at the stage(s) when the outbreak no longer can be contained at its source. Methods: Nominal group methods for reaching consensus on complex problems were used to transform requirements data obtained from international experts into an implementation protocol. The analysis was performed in a cyclical process in which the experts first individually provided input to working documents and then discussed them in conferences calls. Argument-based representation in design patterns was used to define the protocol at technical, system, and pandemic evidence levels. Results: The Protocol for a Standardized information infrastructure for Pandemic and Emerging infectious disease Response (PROSPER) outlines the implementation of information infrastructure aligned with pandemic response programs. The protocol covers analyses of the community at risk, the response processes, and response impacts. For each of these, the protocol outlines the implementation of a supporting information infrastructure in hierarchical patterns ranging from technical components and system functions to pandemic evidence production. Conclusions: The PROSPER protocol provides guidelines for implementation of an information infrastructure for pandemic response programs both in settings where sophisticated health information systems already are used and in developing communities where there is limited access to financial and technical resources. The protocol is based on a generic health service model and its functions are adjusted for community-level analyses of outbreak detection and progress, and response program effectiveness. Scientifically grounded reporting principles need to be established for interpretation of information derived from outbreak detection algorithms and predictive modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ACKOFF RL, 1979, J OPER RES SOC, V30, P189, DOI 10.2307/3009600
[2]  
Alexander C., 1979, The Timeless Way of Building
[3]   The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health [J].
Armstrong, Rebecca ;
Waters, Elizabeth ;
Roberts, Helen ;
Oliver, Sandy ;
Popay, Jennie .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 28 (04) :384-389
[4]   Understanding Detection Performance in Public Health Surveillance: Modeling Aberrancy-detection Algorithms [J].
Buckeridge, David L. ;
Okhmatovskaia, Anna ;
Tu, Samson ;
O'Connor, Martin ;
Nyulas, Csongor ;
Musen, Mark A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2008, 15 (06) :760-769
[5]  
Buschmann F., 1996, SYSTEM PATTERNS PATT
[6]   Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: A review of volunteer challenge studies [J].
Carrat, Fabrice ;
Vergu, Elisabeta ;
Ferguson, Neil M. ;
Lemaitre, Magali ;
Cauchemez, Simon ;
Leach, Steve ;
Valleron, Alain-Jacques .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 167 (07) :775-785
[7]   How outbreaks of infectious disease are detected: A review of surveillance systems and outbreaks [J].
Dato, V ;
Wagner, MM ;
Fapohunda, A .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2004, 119 (05) :464-471
[8]   Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project [J].
Davidoff, F. ;
Batalden, P. ;
Stevens, D. ;
Ogrinc, G. ;
Mooney, S. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 :3-9
[9]   EVALUATING QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE [J].
DONABEDIAN, A .
MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1966, 44 (03) :166-206
[10]   An implementation research agenda [J].
Eccles, Martin P. ;
Armstrong, David ;
Baker, Richard ;
Cleary, Kevin ;
Davies, Huw ;
Davies, Stephen ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
Ilott, Irene ;
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise ;
Leng, Gillian ;
Logan, Stuart ;
Marteau, Theresa ;
Michie, Susan ;
Rogers, Hugh ;
Rycroft-Malone, Jo ;
Sibbald, Bonnie .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4