Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale

被引:35
作者
Esposito, Andrea [1 ]
Buscarino, Valentina [2 ]
Raciti, Dario [3 ]
Casiraghi, Elena [4 ]
Manini, Matteo [5 ]
Biondetti, Pietro [6 ]
Forzenigo, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Maggiore Policlin Hosp, Div Radiol, Via F Sforza 35, Milan, Italy
[2] St Andrea Hosp, Div Radiol, Corso M Abbiate 21, Vercelli, Italy
[3] Citta Sesto San Giovanni Hosp, Div Radiol, Viale G Matteotti 83, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Comp Sci DI, Via G Celoria 18, Milan, Italy
[5] Papa Giovanni XXIII Hosp, Dept Specialty & Transplant Med, Gastroenterol Hepatol & Transplant Unit, Piazza OMS 1, Bergamo, Italy
[6] Abano Terme Policlin Hosp, Div Radiol, Piazza C Colombo 1, Abano Terme, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2020年 / 125卷 / 01期
关键词
Liver cirrhosis; Carcinoma; hepatocellular; Magnetic resonance imaging; Early detection of cancer; Data interpretation; statistical; ACID-ENHANCED MRI; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; CANCER; CT; CATEGORIZATION; FEATURES; CRITERIA; V2014;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-019-01092-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the performance of the LI-RADS v.2018 scale by comparing it with the Likert scale, in the characterization of liver lesions.MethodsA total of 39 patients with chronic liver disease underwent MR examination for characterization of 44 liver lesions. Images were independently analyzed by two radiologists using the LI-RADS scale and by another two radiologists using the Likert scale. The reference standard used was either histopathological evaluation or a 4-year MRI follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.ResultsThe LI-RADS scale obtained an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%, while the Likert scale achieved an accuracy of 79%, a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 89% and a NPV of 70%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 85% for the LI-RADS scale and 83% for the Likert scale. The inter-observer agreement was strong (k=0.89) between the LI-RADS evaluators and moderate (k=0.69) between the Likert evaluators.ConclusionsThere was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two scales; nevertheless, we suggest that the LI-RADS scale be used, as it appeared more objective and consistent.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Changing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence and Liver Cancer Mortality Rates in the United States [J].
Altekruse, Sean F. ;
Henley, S. Jane ;
Cucinelli, James E. ;
McGlynn, Katherine A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (04) :542-553
[2]   Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS - An In-depth Analysis [J].
Barth, Borna K. ;
Donati, Olivio F. ;
Fischer, Michael A. ;
Ulbrich, Erika J. ;
Karlo, Christoph A. ;
Becker, Anton ;
Seifert, Burkhard ;
Reiner, Caecilia S. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) :1145-1153
[3]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[4]   Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Cha, Dong Ik ;
Jang, Kyung Mi ;
Kim, Seong Hyun ;
Kang, Tae Wook ;
Song, Kyoung Doo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) :4394-4405
[5]   Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients [J].
Chernyak, Victoria ;
Fowler, Kathryn J. ;
Kamaya, Aya ;
Kielar, Ania Z. ;
Elsayes, Khaled M. ;
Bashir, Mustafa R. ;
Kono, Yuko ;
Do, Richard K. ;
Mitchell, Donald G. ;
Singal, Amit G. ;
Tang, An ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) :816-830
[6]   LI-RADS® ancillary features on CT and MRI [J].
Chernyak, Victoria ;
Tang, An ;
Flusberg, Milana ;
Papadatos, Demetri ;
Bijan, Bijan ;
Kono, Yuko ;
Santillan, Cynthia .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) :82-100
[7]   Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 With Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation of LI-RADS Category 4 and 5 Criteria [J].
Choi, Sang Hyun ;
Byun, Jae Ho ;
Kim, So Yeon ;
Lee, So Jung ;
Won, Hyung Jin ;
Shin, Yong Moon ;
Kim, Pyo Nyun .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (08) :483-490
[8]   Imaging-Based Diagnostic Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Cruite, Irene ;
Tang, An ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (01) :41-55
[9]   Repeatability of Diagnostic Features and Scoring Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using MR Imaging [J].
Davenport, Matthew S. ;
Khalatbari, Shokoufeh ;
Liu, Peter S. C. ;
Maturen, Katherine E. ;
Kaza, Ravi K. ;
Wasnik, Ashish P. ;
Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M. ;
Glazer, Daniel I. ;
Stein, Erica B. ;
Patel, Jeet ;
Somashekar, Deepak K. ;
Viglianti, Benjamin L. ;
Hussain, Hero K. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 272 (01) :132-142
[10]   Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis:: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Forner, Alejandro ;
Vilana, Ramon ;
Ayuso, Carmen ;
Bianchi, Lluis ;
Sole, Manel ;
Ayuso, Juan Ramon ;
Boix, Loreto ;
Sala, Margarita ;
Varela, Maria ;
Llovet, Josep M. ;
Bru, Concepcio ;
Bruix, Jordi .
HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 47 (01) :97-104