Protective effects of high -potency FMDV O1 Manisa monovalent vaccine in cattle challenged with FMDV O/SKR/2010 at 7 or 4 days post vaccination

被引:11
作者
Horsington, Jacquelyn [1 ]
Beascoechea Perez, Claudia [2 ]
Maradei, Eduardo [2 ]
Galdo Novo, Sabrina [2 ]
Gonzales, Jose L. [3 ]
Singanallur, Nagendrakumar B. [1 ]
Bonastre, Paula [2 ]
Vosloo, Wilna [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Australian Anim Hlth Lab, 5 Portarlington Rd, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] SENASA Serv Nacl Sanidad & Calidad Agroalimentari, Talcahuano 1660, RA-1640 San Isidro, Argentina
[3] Wageningen Biovet Res, Dept Bacteriol & Epidemiol, Houtribweg 39, NL-8221 RA Lelystad, Netherlands
关键词
Foot-and-mouth disease virus; Vaccine efficacy; Heterologous challenge; Cattle; MOUTH-DISEASE; EMERGENCY VACCINATION; HETEROLOGOUS CHALLENGE; VIRUS; ANTIBODIES; SHEEP; REDUCTION; DIAGNOSIS; OUTBREAK; PIGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.102
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Serotype O foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus belonging to the SEA topotype continues to be a significant problem in the Eastern Asia region, with outbreaks in Japan and South Korea resulting in the culling of over 3.5 million cattle and pigs in recent years. High-potency 01 Manisa vaccine was previously shown to provide protection in cattle 21 days post vaccination (dpv) following challenge with a representative virus, O/SKR/2010. This study tested the ability of the O1 Manisa vaccine to protect cattle from infection and disease with the O/SKR/2010 virus within just 4 or 7 days post vaccination. The vaccine protected 50% of cattle from clinical disease when administered 7 days prior to challenge, but was not protective with just 4 days between vaccination and challenge. Viraemia was significantly reduced in animals challenged 7 dpv but not 4 dpv, compared to unvaccinated controls, however, there were no effects on the level of virus detected in nasal and oral secretions regardless of vaccination time. The level of neutralising antibodies detected in cattle challenged 7 dpv correlated with protection from clinical disease. All animals seroconverted to FMDV non-structural proteins, suggesting no sterile protection. An equal number of animals became persistently infected in both vaccine groups. The results indicated that high-potency O1 Manisa vaccine administered just 7 days prior to challenge should provide partial protection of cattle if an outbreak of O/SKR/2010, or related viruses, occurs, and would be useful to limit spread of FMDV when used in conjunction with other control measures. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5179 / 5185
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], R PACKAGE
  • [2] Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease I: Epidemiological consequences
    Backer, J. A.
    Hagenaars, T. J.
    Nodelijk, G.
    van Roermund, H. J. W.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2012, 107 (1-2) : 27 - 40
  • [3] A review of emergency foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines
    Barnett, PV
    Carabin, H
    [J]. VACCINE, 2002, 20 (11-12) : 1505 - 1514
  • [4] Improvement of a serodiagnostic strategy for foot-and-mouth disease virus surveillance in cattle under systematic vaccination:: a combined system of an indirect ELISA-3ABC with an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay
    Bergmann, IE
    Malirat, V
    Neitzert, E
    Beck, E
    Panizzutti, N
    Sánchez, C
    Falczuk, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2000, 145 (03) : 473 - 489
  • [5] High potency vaccines induce protection against heterologous challenge with foot-and-mouth disease virus
    Brehm, K. E.
    Kumar, N.
    Thulke, H. -H.
    Haas, B.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2008, 26 (13) : 1681 - 1687
  • [6] PORTRAITS OF VIRUSES - FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE VIRUS .8.
    BROOKSBY, JB
    [J]. INTERVIROLOGY, 1982, 18 (1-2) : 1 - 23
  • [7] Development and characterization of a bovine serum evaluation panel as a standard for immunoassays based on detection of antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease viral non-capsid proteins
    Campos, R. de M.
    Mahrat, V.
    Neitzert, E.
    Grazioli, S.
    Brocchi, E.
    Sanchez, C.
    Falczuk, A. J.
    Ortiz, S.
    Rebello, M. A.
    Bergmann, I. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 151 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [8] STIMULATION BY HETEROTYPIC ANTIGENS OF FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE VIRUS-ANTIBODIES IN VACCINATED CATTLE
    CARTWRIGHT, B
    CHAPMAN, WG
    SHARPE, RT
    [J]. RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1982, 32 (03) : 338 - 342
  • [9] Further evaluation of higher potency vaccines for early protection of cattle against FMDV direct contact challenge
    Cox, Sarah J.
    Parida, Satya
    Voyce, Charlotte
    Reid, Scott A.
    Hamblin, Pip A.
    Hutchings, Geoff
    Paton, David J.
    Barnett, Paul V.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2007, 25 (44) : 7687 - 7695
  • [10] Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review
    Cox, Sarah J.
    Barnett, Paul V.
    [J]. VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2009, 40 (03)