Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

被引:21
作者
Pikaart, Dirk P. [1 ]
Holloway, Robert W. [1 ]
Ahmad, Sarfraz [1 ]
Finkler, Nell J. [1 ]
Bigsby, Glenn E., IV [1 ]
Ortiz, B. Hannah [1 ]
DeNardis, Sara A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Hosp Canc Inst, Gynecol Oncol Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
cervical cancer; radical hysterectomy; clinical-pathologic analyses; postoperative; complications;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To provide representative data analyses of surgical morbidity and clinical-pathologic factors for Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomies (ARE) with pelvic aortic node dissection performed in a private practice with a fellowship-training program. Methods. From 1997 to 2005, 329 cervical cancer patients underwent ARE with lymphadenectorny. Two hundred and one cases performed at our primary institution were analyzed for operative time, blood loss, intra-operative complications, surgical-pathologic data, recurrence of disease and adjuvant therapy. Results. We evaluated 201 surgical patients who underwent Type 2 (n = 45) or Type 3 (n = 156) ARH with node dissection. The FIGO stages were: IB1=64%, IB2=6.5%, IA=28.4%, and IIA=1%. Aortic node dissection was performed in 64% of Type 3 cases and none of Type 2 cases. Pfannenstiel incision was used in 80% (Type 2) and 76% (Type 3) cases. A suprapubic catheter was placed in 9% of Type 2 and 81% of Type 3 cases. Median age and weight were 47 +/- 13 years and 149 +/- 35 lb. Positive nodes were identified in 12% of Type 3 and 2.2% of Type 2 cases. No positive aortic nodes were found. For Types 2 and 3 ARH, median operative time was 80 +/- 90 vs. 99 +/- 23 min (p < 0.00 1) and blood loss was 250 +/- 134 vs. 300 +/- 234 ml (p < 0.001). The transfusion rate was 3%. Intra-operative complications included: 3 ureteral injuries and I colotomy. Tumor histology was 60% squamous, 37% adenocarcinoma, 1% adenosquamous, and 2% others. Conclusions. ARH with pelvic lymphadenectomy in modem practice is an efficient, safe procedure with low transfusion rate and shorter hospital stay than previously reported. Data will be useful as comparison when scrutinizing novel approaches to radical hysterectomy including robotic-assisted and laparoscopic techniques. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy [J].
Abu-Rustum, NR ;
Gemignani, ML ;
Moore, K ;
Sonoda, Y ;
Venkatraman, E ;
Brown, C ;
Poynor, E ;
Chi, DS ;
Barakat, RR .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 91 (02) :402-409
[2]   RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR STAGE-IB CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - 21 YEARS EXPERIENCE [J].
ARTMAN, LE ;
HOSKINS, WJ ;
BIBRO, MC ;
HELLER, PB ;
WEISER, EB ;
BARNHILL, DR ;
PARK, RC .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1987, 28 (01) :8-13
[3]  
BOGGESS J, 2006, GYNECOL ONCOL, V101, pS18
[4]  
Clark J.G., 1895, Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull, V6, P120
[5]   DIFFERENCES IN THE MORBIDITY OF RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY BETWEEN GYNECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGISTS [J].
COVENS, A ;
ROSEN, B ;
GIBBONS, A ;
OSBORNE, R ;
MURPHY, J ;
DEPETRILLO, A ;
LICKRISH, G ;
SHAW, P ;
COLGAN, T .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1993, 51 (01) :39-45
[6]   Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH):: prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer [J].
Hertel, H ;
Köhler, C ;
Michels, W ;
Possover, M ;
Tozzi, R ;
Schneider, A .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (03) :505-511
[7]   Extent of radical hysterectomy: evolving emphasis [J].
Hoffman, MS .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 94 (01) :1-9
[8]   Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study [J].
Jackson, KS ;
Das, N ;
Naik, R ;
Lopes, AD ;
Godfrey, KA ;
Hatem, MH ;
Monaghan, JM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 95 (03) :655-661
[9]   Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: A prospective randomized study [J].
Landoni, F ;
Maneo, A ;
Cormio, G ;
Perego, P ;
Milani, R ;
Caruso, O ;
Mangioni, C .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 80 (01) :3-12
[10]   Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer [J].
Lee, CL ;
Huang, KG ;
Jain, S ;
Lee, PS ;
Soong, YK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (04) :481-487