Report on a Delphi process and workshop to improve accrual to cancer clinical trials

被引:2
作者
Bell, J. A. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Balneaves, L. G. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kelly, M. T.
Richardson, H. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Support Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Joint Ctr Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Leslie Dan Fac Pharm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Queens Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[6] Queens Univ, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Canadian Canc Trials Grp, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cancer clinical trials; trial accrual; ethics; patient autonomy; patient decision-making; knowledge translation; access; barriers;
D O I
10.3747/co.23.3110
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer clinical trials (CCTS) are essential for furthering knowledge and developing effective interventions to improve the lives of people living with cancer in Canada. Randomized controlled trials are particularly important for developing evidence-based health care interventions. To produce robust and relevant research conclusions, timely and sufficient accrual to CCTS is essential. The present report delivers the key recommendations emerging from a workshop meeting, Improve Accrual to Cancer Clinical Trials, that was hosted by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group and funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The meeting, which took place in Toronto, Ontario, in April 2012 before the Canadian Cancer Trials Group annual spring meeting, brought together key stakeholders from across Canada to explore creative strategies for improving accrual to CCTS. The objectives of the workshop were to provide an opportunity for knowledge exchange with respect to the research evidence and the ethics theory related to CCT accrual and to promote discussion of best practices and policies related to enhancing CCT access and accrual in Canada. The workshop provided the foundation for establishing new interdisciplinary research collaborations to overcome the identified barriers to CCT participation in Canada. Meeting participants also supported the development of evidence-based policies and practices to make trials more accessible to Canadians living with cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 130
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Response to a proposal for an integrative medicine curriculum
    Benjamin, Patricia J.
    Phillips, Reed
    Warren, Don
    Salveson, Catherine
    Hammerschlag, Richard
    Snider, Pamela
    Haas, Mitchell
    Barrett, Richard
    Chapman, Timothy
    Kaneko, Robert
    Martin, Morgan
    Myer, Suzzanne Nelson
    Nedrow, Anne
    Niemiec, Catherine
    O'Bryon, David
    Ochoa, Sonia
    Peterson, David
    Weeks, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2007, 13 (09) : 1021 - 1033
  • [2] Canadian Cancer Research Alliance, 2011, REP STAT CLIN TRIALS
  • [3] CONSENSUS METHODS - CHARACTERISTICS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE
    FINK, A
    KOSECOFF, J
    CHASSIN, M
    BROOK, RH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (09) : 979 - 983
  • [4] THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE - A CRITIQUE
    GOODMAN, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1987, 12 (06) : 729 - 734
  • [5] Greatorex J, 2000, J ADV NURS, V32, P1016
  • [6] McMurray A R, 1994, J Nurs Staff Dev, V10, P62
  • [7] A quality management model for integrated care: results of a Delphi and Concept Mapping study
    Minkman, Mirella
    Ahaus, Kees
    Fabbricotti, Isabelle
    Nabitz, Udo
    Huijsman, Robbert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 21 (01) : 66 - 75
  • [8] Defining off-label and unlicensed use of medicines for children: Results of a Delphi survey
    Neubert, Antje
    Wong, Ian C. K.
    Bonifazi, Alessandro
    Catapano, Mariana
    Felisi, Mariagrazia
    Baiardi, Paola
    Giaquinto, Carlo
    Knibbe, Catherijne A. J.
    Sturkenboom, Miriam C. J. M.
    Ghaleb, Maisoon A.
    Ceci, Adriana
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (5-6) : 316 - 322